Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dyslexic agnostic

Dyslexic agnostic

• Dyslexic agnostic (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gillespee (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

It's just a little weird that they both are always on the same page. Dyslexic Agnostic, tendes to follow me around everywhere I edit about half hour after I finish. When I low my activities, so does Dyslexic. Gillespee was only active in all issues involving D.A. and myself. His contribs are only pages where D.A. and I have clashed. Recently I told him for the second time (I onece told him long ago and then I forgot all about it) I suspect he is a sock and he denied it. Since then he has been polishing his act a lot. Dyslexic Agnostic and Gillespee follow the same modus operandi they are more editors than writers, they tend to erase paragraps, sentences or words, fix wikis, whenever they write they kinda get the info wrong (I guess they don't research enough before) and they insult me in the same fashion. I don't keep track of Gillespee edits, but I have a whole bunch of link I make in my page whenever DA edits right after me. --T-man, the wise 06:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I welcome the RFC, please prove to T-Man that Dyslexic and myself are not one in the same. Please end his delusions in this regard. --Gillespee 06:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, here are DA's edits involving me: User talk:T-man, the Wise Scarecrow/Vandalism & Harassment. Does Gillespee need to edit at the same period to be a sock? My angle was that before recently Gillespee only interacted with me and DA, but always in favor of DA. Recently DA has low his activity and Gillespee is very active but before that it was the opposite.

• Both tend to cut off info and specially if I put it:here he erased my work recently, some wikis I though that would be usefull to the page of a sort of "spin off" TV series. here he chopped off several paragraphs
• Both are conservative party/republican, pro bush, pro war, religious, male, married men with certain knoledge of laws[[1]] and a fixation of
  DCAU
  whitout ever really outstand as blofs in the matter.
• [he only talks to DA or me] (Benon has been in the middle of the cross fire between me and DA several times]] There are some fake minor discussions with DA but they are both always against me.
• DA is a lawyer, Gillespe was told by the suggestbot (whatever that is) to expand the
  DC animated universe
  articles, but none really ever add any info, they just take off in a doing first asking later fashion.
• He is the only person who thinks this about his own edits the way they speak "I echo this" "I encourage that." "His delutions". Previously this sock was very properly used (per Jimbo Whales thoughts on the matter), however they can's avoid certain details.
• Summary with DA's characteristic "sight" expression.

Is that enought evidence? Were you asking specifically for something else? Feel free to take off exes or redundance of info if you want.--T-man, the wise 02:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. All that is necessary is to say that I deny the allegation; it is groundless and a fantasy of the accuser. -- Dyslexic agnostic 02:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biggest piece of evidence that I am not, in fact, DA's sock puppet brought about to further torture T-Man: I first editted at 10:27, on June 11, 2005.[2] T-Man first editted at 02:47, on November 14, 2005.[3] Why would DA set up a sock puppet to annoy T-Man a full 5 months before T-Man even editted an article on Wikipedia?--Gillespee 03:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Unrelated Mackensen (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]