Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ronosen

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ronosen}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


Ronosen (3nd case)

  • Supporting evidence: User:Platypusbeak Same pattern as other Ronosen socks.[1], and now wikistalking and vandalising other articles I've been working on.[2][3]
And now he's trying to stalk me in real life.[4]
Well, if he is, he's not being very successful if he's looking for you in Hyatt Hotels. ;) --12.8.15.226 (talk) 05:11, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, he's not being very successful. Thanks for reverting his vandalism. ~ priyanath talk 05:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry ... I didn't mean anything by that - I was just saying that, despite his assumption based on my revert of his vandalism, I am not you.--12.8.15.226 (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understood - I was about to make a joke about him trying to find me in the Hyatt Hotels, and finding you instead, but then he doesn't know who either of us are, so he is really more lost than he thinks. :-) My joke got lost between my brain and my fingers, somewhere about 'I'm wasting too much time on this guy'..... ~ priyanath talk 22:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • User:65.49.14.95 left message on my talk page - same old same old.[5]
  • User:74.55.90.58 also just vandalized a page that I created.[6]
    • Per CU, the pattern matches Ronosen. Per the visible on-wiki evidence, this is  Confirmed. In addition, 74.55.90.58 is confirmed -- I have blocked this as a proxy. It doesn't appear to be open, but given Ronosen's history of using open proxies, I am happy to block it. As for 65.49.14.95, this is clearly related behaviour, but I cannot find any other behaviour that warrants blocking it, given that there is significant productive editing. Sam Korn (smoddy) 11:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Platypusbeak (talk · contribs) blocked indef. IPs left as-is per checkuser - Alison ❤ 18:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Ronosen (2nd case)

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 23:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Reformedbrahmovandal is a brand new editor who admits to being "formerly associated with User:Ronosen's group of meat puppets" on his user page.[7]

User:Rtiact is an account that has been asleep for sometime, and interestingly he once made an edit to the article Ronen Sen.[8]

User:Project brahmo is a brand new account whose very first edit was to create a new WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Brahmoism.[9]

All three editors make up the new

Keshub Chunder Sen article, which the Ronosen socks were editing, is coming off of protection in a day, so these new puppets may be gearing up for action. ~ priyanath talk 23:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ronosen (2nd case). – Luna Santin (talk) 00:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
 Confirmed - the following accounts as socks of Ronosen (talk · contribs):
  1. Reformedbrahmovandal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  2. Rtiact (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  3. Yvantanguy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
  4. Sroy1947 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
 Possible - the following account:
  1. Project brahmo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Also  IP blocked - editor uses open proxies - Alison ❤ 05:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: Confirmed accounts indef blocked, and Project brahmo (talk · contribs) indef blocked based on behavior. Tiptoety talk


Ronosen

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 00:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Supporting evidence: The IPs are located far apart, so the 2 registered editors may each be using the respective ips as sockpuppets to revert, attack, etc.

Continued removal of an image against policy, by all 4 editors: [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

212.227.114.82 did the same here: [21]

In addition, today

Talk:Keshub_Chunder_Sen, along with revealing an editor's personal information. It was oversighted, so there is no diff. All the accounts have been making almost entirely disruptive edits, so there are likely plenty of other grounds to block. Thanks,~ priyanath talk 00:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment - At least one of them 195.178.107.95 (talk · contribs), is an open proxy that has since been blocked. --Ragib (talk) 00:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 IP blocked - Ronosen (talk · contribs) is exclusively using open proxies, all of which are blocked now. Also blocked Ronosen.
Worklikeadog (talk · contribs) is  Likely to be the same editor, and also uses open proxies. Basically, all of the above IPs are open proxies.
Lillycottage (talk · contribs) is  Likely to be related to the above accounts - Alison ❤ 02:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Alison! ~ priyanath talk 02:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted ~ priyanath talk 02:27, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The User:Gayatrisavitr account was created hours after User:Ronosen and his open proxies were blocked. User:Gayatrisavitr is focusing on the same article, same POV, and immediately attacked User:P.K.Niyogi with off-wiki evidence (dif) that forced User:P.K.Niyogi to retire (much like User:Ronosen's now oversighted attempts to expose the real-life identity of an admin). For that alone he should be blocked, or for being a SPA with a pattern of disruptive edits. Too many choices.... User:Bengalibaboo - also a new account, SPA, similar editing pattern and lack of civility.

 Confirmed:
 IP blocked as open proxies:
Sam Korn (smoddy) 15:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Clerk note: blocked and tagged. Tiptoety talk 02:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Ronosen&oldid=1144622069"