Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Runteldat

Runteldat

• Runteldat (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Liradio (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Rollosmokes (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: With the same edits to the same page, like WPIX and reverting to an image that "Rollosmokes" uploaded, a couple editors (including this one) have expressed concern that "Runteldat" in a sock of "Rollosmokes". - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 16, 2008 @ 01:29
  • I have added User:Liradio as a percaution as this edit strikes me as possible foul play. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 16, 2008 @ 01:34
• Comment This is related to
  WP:ANI#Did I mess up, or...?; I think the two R accounts are indeed socks and Liradio obviously isn't, judging by edit patterns. --Gutza ^{T T+} 01:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  P.S. If all three do prove to be socks, please perform a reverse lookup on the IPs and report any other related users involved (per ANI or edit patterns), because in that case this might be a publicity stunt. I don't believe that's the case at this point, but just in case. --Gutza ^{T T+} 01:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Here's Runteldat's first edit ever & here is Rollosmoke's third edit to the same article. Both edits are in error about Mineola being part of Town of Hempstead in that year. That links them in ways besides the TV stuff. R &R both wipe messages from their talk pages & Runteldat has evasively declined repeated requests to deny he is Rollosmokes. Also, the File:Wpixcw11-1.png that has been deleted was first uploaded by Rollosmokes [1], changed by someone & then later changed back by Runteldat[2] (i.e.: Runteldat reverted to previous version by Rollosmokes, though Runteldat claims to not know who Rollosmokes is) --JimWae (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Geeze, we don't vote on checkuser requests. —— nixeagle 04:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think that was a vote, per se, but more evidence to go along with what I already added. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 16, 2008 @ 06:13

 Confirmed Runteldat (talk · contribs) = Rollosmokes (talk · contribs) = Subwaykid (talk · contribs)

 Inconclusive Liradio (talk · contribs) — Rlevse • Talk • 13:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

clerks handle as appropriate. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: All blocked. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted

• Videogamer360 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• BiggieFats (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Rollosmokes (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Would like to check these two accounts, one that popped up after the blocks and one before, both with the same edits as "Runteldat" and "Rollosmokes" including Rollo's "CW" not "The CW" style. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 18, 2008 @ 23:51

Rollosmokes was already blocked and confirmed.

Videogamer360 (talk · contribs) is  Unrelated. BiggieFats (talk · contribs) is  Possible the same as Runteldat (talk · contribs) — Rlevse • Talk • 00:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]