Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Juan Manuel de Rosas
<
Wikipedia:Requests for mediation
Juan Manuel de Rosas
Formal mediation case | |
---|---|
Article | Juan Manuel de Rosas (talk) |
Mediator | PhilKnight (talk) |
Status | Awaiting party agreement |
Notes | None |
- Users involved in dispute
- Articles concerned in this dispute
- Other steps of dispute resolutionthat have been attempted
- Talk:Juan Manuel de Rosas#About the lack of neutrality, the biased view and arbitrary choice of facts added into this article
- Wikipedia:Third opinion (see link directly above)
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Juan Manuel de Rosas (also see this)
Issues to be mediated
- Primary issues
- How, and where, should the article Juan Manuel de Rosas mention the different views of Rosas?
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
All parties please indicate below whether they agree to mediation of this dispute; remember to sign your post. Extended comments should be made on case talk page. Every party listed above will be automatically notified that this request has been filed.
- Agree. Lecen (talk) 14:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Agree. Cambalachero (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Decision of the Mediation Committee
A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate whether this request is to be rejected. Notes concerning the request and questions to the parties may also be posed by a committee member in this section.
- I am recused on this request and any subsequent mediation which may result from it. — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Accept to mediate disputes concerning balance and neutrality in the [•] 22:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)]
- [•] 11:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)]
- Thanks for the introduction AGK. I'll start the mediation in a day or so, after I complete some background reading. PhilKnight (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but I will have to decline taking part in this discussion for the time being. I'm very busy in real life right now, and I don't know when will I have free time again. As you may notice in my contributions, I have not edited since weeks, except for passing-by comments or edits at 2:00 in the morning (which is when I finish my current tasks and distract a little before going to sleep). Initially I thought I could manage both the things I'm doing and editing in wikipedia, but unfortunately that's not the case. I do not want to have everybody sitting and waiting for my replies, and I apologize if that was the case so far. As for the article, well, if by the time I return there is still interest in discussing about it, then we may begin talking again. Cambalachero (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)