Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 118

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

• Gerald Duff · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

According to the editor, the page was deleted for Reason A7: not important. Gerald Duff is a noted author with 13 Books currently available on Amazon. I wrote the Wikipedia article with an attempt to be humorous in Duff's style. Perhaps this put the reviewer off. -Jread 21205 (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Number of books available on Amazon doesn't automatically confer notability; whether the author has been written about or their books have achieved critical acclaim or a movie deal does. Also, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so I do somewhat agree with your suspicion that the levity was inappropriate, but it wouldn't have, in and of itself, triggered a speedy. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment:: if you click on the "redlink" Gerald Duff again, you will see that the A7 deletion was in 2006; that article was about an American lawyer. Your article is still at User:Jread 21205/Sandbox where you wrote it, and has not been submitted for publication.(Mistake - see below.) I have added a {{User sandbox}} template at the top which has a link for you to submit the article, when it is ready, to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will review it and either accept it or give you feedback. Before you submit it, though:

• Read
  WP:Your first article
  for general advice.
• Rewrite it to remove the "jokey" tone. This is a serious encyclopedia.
• Add references (a) to
  WP:AUTHOR
  .

JohnCD (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

The article in question was Gerald duff with a small d. It was deleted as blatant advertising (G11), but I think A7 would have been possibly more appropriate. Opinions vary. Peridon (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

BTW being available on Amazon merely indicates existence. They'll list almost anything so long as it's available on demand and they don't have to buy in a stock. I've seen a 20 page book on there with an asking price of £97. I don't know how many it sold... Peridon (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

(Self-trout). I saw the sandbox in the user's contributions, assumed that was the explanation, and didn't look in his deleted contributions. Regardless, I think his best plan is to revise the sandbox article and submit it via AfC as I suggested, so as to get it checked and get feedback. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SF-7x Super Fruit · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Superfruit1, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk
  ) 21:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

• Comment: in its present form the draft is hopelessly promotional and needs a complete rewrite. Wikipedia is not a platform for free advertising, and anything like that is liable to speedy deletion. If, as your username suggests, you are connected with the company, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)JohnCD (talk)

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vijayannamalai.wiki (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. We have never had a page with that name. If you mean

WP:Introduction and Wikipedia is not about YOU to find out more about it. JohnCD (talk

) 09:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

• Outpsyjah · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This psytrance project needs its wiki article undeleted so that it can be referenced in coordination with other projects from Australian artist Tom Vallance, who is responsible for numerous unsigned music projects -Tomahawk333 (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

do not contain a credible assertion of the significance

of the subject.

You would do best to start by making an article about Vallance, with references to

WP:MUSICBIO. Individual projects will also need to show their own WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk

) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

An article on Tom Vallance http://western-riverina-arts.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/tom-vallance-rides-again.html, http://www.irrigator.com.au/story/199937/art-space-a-dream-for-artist/ (Australian artist) can be addressed in coordination with the outpsyjah article. The outpsyjah mixes comprise a saga, which is a notable feat in itself - also, they are not signed to any label and no revenue is being gained from the music, so to label this as advertising or promotion is to misinterpret the importance of outpsyjah's music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I can link you to a number of external sources that reference the works of Tom Vallance ^^^ - if that information will be seen to legitimize the existence of this article.

And there are multiple sources of information on the outpsyjah psytrance project, which cite its importance; https://soundcloud.com/outpsyjah, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr64G9k1jUA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not for any kind of promotion, even of non-commercial enterprises - see

WP:CREATIVE. Once other people have written about these projects, Wikipedia can summarise what they say, but an encyclopedia is not the place to announce new things. JohnCD (talk

) 09:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Grupo de Capoeira Beribazu · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 115.187.228.108, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 13:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geva Salerno (Geva Ledezma Salerno) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 70.193.196.24, request the undeletion of this

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. We also don't need the whole of the article posting here, please. Peridon (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

It is deleted now as blatant advertising per

talk

) 19:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

• Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.170.85.80 (talk) 22:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Already  Done two days ago, see

WP:REFUND#Sydney Alliance about twenty items above this. JohnCD (talk

) 22:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Platform505 · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This entry needs revision. Platform505 exists. I did not get any notice of it being deleted by wikipedia - just an email on Feb 9 after it had been deleted on Feb 8. Please reinstate it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icecream53 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 23:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

• File:Terranigma box.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This image was replaced by the PNG version in

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh Tariq Al Qassimi · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rak Holding, request the undeletion of this

notability. JohnCD (talk

) 10:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Kcal Healthy Fast Food · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

No real reason why it has been deleted, follows closely to macdonalds and other fast food chain wikipedia pages -AzizaComm (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

talk

) 09:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Addendum: User AzizaComm is apparently Aziza Communications, a PR firm editing to promote clients. The account is now blocked for promotion and username policy violation. ~

talk

) 10:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

...aaand, sockpuppet account

talk

) 10:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• R.a.G.e · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page was deleted via WP:Prod on 21 September 2006. It has breviously been nominated for deletion at

• You're right that PROD should not be used on articles that have been to AfD, even if the result was keep or no consensus. However, if this is restored, it is very likely to get sent straight to AfD again. If you are intending to work on it, it can be restored into your user space. Peridon (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

I think your post should read "not previously discussed on AfD". Peridon (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Not done The PROD vs AFD policies were very different in 2006 when this article was deleted. That, and for temporal reasons alone (I mean seriously - you want an article undeleted that was deleted 8 years ago??) this is unwise to undelete (except for possibly to a draft somewhere) DP 10:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Performance Nissan · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FbachmanII, request the undeletion of this

•  Question:
  notability. It was a car dealer ... they're not notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. Is there something somewhere that grants any inkling of notability??? DP
  17:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

The dealership sold to the public company for reportedly the highest multiple of earnings in the history of United States Nissan dealerships, after it was started from scratch. Please advise as to what else would make it notable, as it WAS a record-breaking breaking one-price dealership for Nissan before it was sold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FbachmanII (talk • contribs)

Do you have a valid, third party

reference for that claim? "Highest earnings for a Nissan dealership" seems pretty specialized and non-notable overall when considering that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable topics DP

10:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Teon · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

re-edit -Ottofung (talk) 05:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 11:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Annakshetra · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Anitaagarwal (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 Question: what is the name of the page you want undeleted? JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

 Comment:: I see you have now re-created this and submitted it. I have added the name above, for anyone else interested. It looks better than the previously-deleted version, so no action required here. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stockopedia · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 94.193.160.185, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 13:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs |
  mfd ) · [revisions
  ]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 180.215.198.77 (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

<content added from duplicate entry--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)>

This is for the benifit of general public as this is information about top ranked aicte govt of india approved business school -180.215.198.77 (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

promotional material, the content was absolutely unsuitable for an encyclopedia article. Note that I have also deleted what I presume is your userpage, which also infringed on the school's copyrighted material.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 16:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jason Brock · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 50.136.245.219, request the undeletion of this

references, and cut out promotional language like "humble, yet extravagant style... highly talented... extremely likeable..." An encyclopedia article should not contain your personal opinions, only facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk

) 17:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Alliance LARP · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The organization's page was deleted for not being notable. The organization was featured on G4 Television, in local newspapers, and on numerous other websites. This was ignored by the people in the deletion discussion when the links were posted there, as a rewrite for the page was in progress. -Brujah7783 (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

administrator who closed the discussion, user Smartse (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk

) 10:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KGLR FM · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Article not abandoned, follow up research into KGLR is taking longer than expected. This article is important for tracking independent radio in CO, and for documenting social movements that reform consolidation of media and demand freedom of speech in the United States. -Rcolbert80 (talk) 20:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 11:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buenvenida · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 112.207.158.121, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 11:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

I participated and requested for the deletion of the above topic but would like the contents of the article placed here please: User:titusfox/LONYGOC —Preceding undated comment added 16:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Do you want

List of Yu-Gi-Oh! cards · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]? the List of notable Yu-Gi-Oh! cards was only a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk

) 20:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Done Undelete screwed up twice, but I think its now all done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Billy Kristanto · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We know that wikipedia is the most popular encyclopedia which effort to note detail reliable information in every aspects of living. Well-known with the open-handed of true information had given by volunteers, which is not able to cover it. Hopefully helping all people who are needy on good information as much as possible based on the 5 pillars.

I have rather a good information, but reliable one. I wrote the article about Billy Kristanto, as a one potential man who build-up the classical and baroque music which people hardly to find, especially in Indonesia. A person who had dual doctoral degree (Ph.D. and Th.D.) from Germany within about 5 year. he also has been held a key role in Stephen Tong's Orchestra, who dealt with Symphony Hall in Jakarta (Aula Simfonia Jakarta), which is one great and International standart concert hall in Indonesia.

I've got this article under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because of insignificant. Meanwhile, i was watching many porn stars and pop figures talked by wikipedia about their history and fad information, even in detail, passing from insignificancy. Well..., if one good information is scarcely acceptable, rather than just the opposite. How might wikipedia will be?

I just a volunteer, if this cause is going on, this is really discouraging me to support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Candi003 (talk • contribs) 04:09, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Y Userfied. We are all just volunteers, but Wikipedia is quite selective about subjects for articles. The test for inclusion is called

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS

.

I have restored the article for you to User:Candi003/Billy Kristanto where you can work on it, but check with the deleting admin, user Peridon (talk), before you return it to the main encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Sreekala Sasidharan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -117.201.248.26 (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Article is at AFD right now. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:44, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk

) 18:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wyshwood Location Recording · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Wyshwood, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 18:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Bliss Wishes · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page seems to have been deleted due to lack of proper citation. I have corrected that issue and the page is as well cited now as many other pages which are simply comprised of an album listing. I am unsure of how to repost the page with corrections being that I have to go through a process of undeletion so I apologize if this is the wrong place. Any advice or guidance is appreciated. I've created a tentative page with corrections at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Etrangere/Bliss_Wishes -Etrangere (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

WP:NALBUMS. Your four references are really only two - the first and third are the same, and so are the second and fourth. JohnCD (talk

) 11:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

assume good faith

but this seems very odd, either you knew this and did it anyway or you added links without actually looking at them, neither of those is a good indicator)

Ok. I understand. I don't have a copy of the original, but in looking at other albums on Wikipedia it seems that a sentence stating what the album is, and who it is by is all that is normally posted. With regard to the references. I'm not sure how to make two sentences that are referring to the same citation show up as one citation. Will look into that. Anyway, thank you for taking a look and the information. Seems like this one simply may not make it as it isn't notable enough. Thanks again - Etrangere

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Langue (Language) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Matthewdfr (talk) 12:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

talk

) 19:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• FairFX · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Hi there, I have gone back and forth with an administrator at Wikipedia, regarding "promotion" on the FairFX page. We actually based the content of this page on our competitors pages, as a result of our content being removed several times... and we have sincerely tried to appease this administrator with the correct content. So with this in mind, our content had more factual references and less "sales-y" information than the following: Transferwise, WorldFirst, CaxtonFX, MoneyCorp, HiFX, Western Union, ICE International Currency Exchange, MoneyCorp, Currencies Direct - to name a few. I really appreciate what you guys do, and have spent half my life on this encyclopedia due to personal curiosity, but it's very frustrating to have our page deleted when our competitors (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TransferWise) have a lot more contentious information - Wikipedia should have one rule for everyone... I would like to have our page undeleted, or at least enter a discussion as to why this has happened, or alternatively have the content of the above pages removed as we all feel this is unfair practice - especially as market leaders in this industry. Thank you. -2A00:1D40:1012:0:5400:48BE:E741:6E (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• WP:NCORP - there IS one single policy for all ES&L
  17:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

administrator who closed the discussion, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review

.

As ES&L stated above, there is one rule for all, and that rule is

talk

) 19:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Storewars Business Simulation · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page "Storewars Business Simulation" gives and information about an unique business iproving progect that runs in form of 3days simulation. -SW International (talk) 12:15, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. ... but it should be deleted and stay deleted ES&L 12:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. The requester's account has also been re-blocked for block evasion; article was previously created by blocked account

talk

) 20:01, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• Emil Polit · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Emil Polit is a well known Polish painter, with quite a few collectors in the US and other English speaking countries. Please note a rich set of searchable results. His Website is built with an extensive English version. English speakers are a significant segment of the artist's following. Please restore this page. -IndyPete (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

@

notability. It appears those sources exist, but have not yet been tapped. You might find some of those sources through the results here. The reasons you've given for undeletion mostly don't speak at all to why it was deleted or what we care about as an encyclopedia. Though in practice it's much easier to find sources in English if you only speak that language, whether his following was only in Mongolia; the only sources on him were in Mongolian; and no one who speaks English had ever heard of him would be fine, as long as his notability was shown through those reliable independent sources – evidence that the world has taken note of him by writing about him substantively and providing verification of the content.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 00:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Please see

talk

) 06:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• International Surety Association · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Dear sir, madam,

We are writing to you with regards to the Wikipedia page of the International Surety Association (ISA) which has recently been deleted by Wikipedia due to possible copyright infringements.

We of course value the importance of Wikipedia with regards to copyright, and therefore we would like to ask your assistance on how we can reinstate this page in line with Wikipedia’s guidelines?

I would like to inform that we are highly surprised Wikipedia decided that the International Surety Association (ISA) is not relevant enough to have his own Wikipedia article. And kindly ask if you could inform us who to contact to amend this remarkable decision?

Looking forward to your response and suggestions for allowing ISA to have its own page on Wikipedia. -Meme1815 (talk) 10:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Not done Please do not copy/paste contents here - admins have the ability to view the deleted text. There appear to be 2 issues: first, copyright violation, and second
  WP:AFC process, however, do not include copyrighted materials at any time DP
  10:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Flyway Film Festival · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was working on the article on a film screened at this festival, and created a red-link to it. Following that red-link I saw an article on the topic had been PRODded. I am going to request userification. If, after looking at the article, I conclude it really isn't notable I'll apply a db-u1. Geo Swan (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC) -Geo Swan (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Geo_Swan/Flyway_Film_Festival. DP 10:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benitec Bipharma · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Snrichards, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. A very strong proviso: the primary reason it was deleted was NOT because it was an abandoned draft or too long, but because it was highly-promotional "article" - which is not permitted. Please review the history of the draft, and edit accordingly before clicking "save" DP
  11:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Neeta_Singhal · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted by Speedy Deletion dur to importance/content and I didn't get a chance to update content and add citations, please reinstate the page and I will update content and add the more citations as required -NeetajisRRST (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. DP
  11:05, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thomas A Law · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DP
  11:06, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Perception Software · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Perception was originally removed because the content was not covered by third party sources. We are prepared and willing to update and add additional sources. This article provides information about a company and the industry of enterprise search. -Darrylpsw (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

• do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. On top of this, linking to LinkedIn profiles in the article? Seriously? DP
  11:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Weathergage capital · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Sgwallis, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 17:29, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• User:Sgwallis/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Sgwallis, request the undeletion of this

 Not done - see entry above. This sandbox page was moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Weathergage capital, which has been restored, and you can work on it there. JohnCD (talk) 17:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Samuel Mensah · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The reason given for deleting this article was "concern was: not proved to have played in a fully professional league". I gave a lot of references that Samuel Mensah played in Superettan and will now play in Allsvenskan. Both of those leagues are professional leagues; the two leagues together comprise the organisation "Swedish Elite Football" (http://www.svenskelitfotboll.se/), which itself is a member of

Pomelotree (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC) -Pomelotree (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. Nothing to do. The article is not deleted. ~

talk

) 19:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OCEANOGENIC POWER · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 190.141.188.55, request the undeletion of this

significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. Also, if you are connected with the company, read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk

) 22:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Camp Lambec - Lambec Lake · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Evrik, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request, to its AfC location rather than your sandbox, which will make it more convenient to progress. The title can be adjusted when it is accepted. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 22:58, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Law Center · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

No reasoning given. -Grantstanleywilson (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 23:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Potential Inertia · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This film, while not secured in distribution has well-known people attached to it, and will be released this year. -Onefishfilms1 (talk) 22:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

You only need one request. And if you're affiliated with the company producing the film, I suggest you read our conflict of interest policy. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 23:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 23:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radius Books · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Tullyr1985 (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

was not), we could not use it by permission for our use but would require the copyright to be released by a verifiable method.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk

) 23:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

• talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]