Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 145

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

• NetBrain Technologies, Inc · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I submitted article for review and it mentioned 916 articles were ahead of me, it would seem quite impossible that on the same day after submitting my hard work would be deleted so promptly, when after submitting it mentioned that it would take over a week or more for review...please put article back into sandbox. I thought submitting an article would also mean getting help to correct any issues 'wiki' has, not tigger happy moderators waiting to delete people's hard work. Very unprofessional! thank you very much. -Turner Paige (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

• @Turner Paige: Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Turner Paige/NetBrain Technologies, Inc. There is some misunderstanding. Any article part of the Articles for Creation (AfC) process should not be deleted immediately (except for copyright violation and some other rare situations), but I do not see that this was developed through the AfC process. It was developed in Main space, and articles in that space can be speedily deleted. I glanced at it and it is not close to ready, but I have userfied it so you can work on it and submit it for review.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Joseph Collins · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 74.138.110.114, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk)
  16:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Bheems Ceciroleo · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

please do not delete this article he is new music director and i am still adding info and giving reference too -Chandooo (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• administrator who carried out the deletion, user Alexf (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. @Chandooo: --S Philbrick(Talk)
  16:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shoptech · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jayccooper, request the undeletion of this

subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shoptech — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayccooper (talk • contribs) 21:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. (already done, just noting it here) --S Philbrick(Talk)
  16:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Kelsey Lee · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I have always refered information to reliable sources and will do so again. I added a reference to watchxhit.com, and, originally, Lee's pages (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter). I know YT, FB, and Twitter aren't reliable sources, but I only included those as Lee's pages. XHIT-loving teen boy (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC) -XHIT-loving teen boy (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• administrator who carried out the deletion, user Deb (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. @XHIT-loving teen boy: --S Philbrick(Talk)
  17:10, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shreekumar Vakkiyil · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, NitashaPinjani, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @NitashaPinjani: --S Philbrick(Talk)
  17:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Happy Socks · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Ilea79, request the undeletion of this

@Ilea79: When you say within our company, are you associated with Happy Socks? If so, have you read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest?--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick:Not within Happy Socks, within the company I work for.

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Ilea79: --S Philbrick(Talk)
  17:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• International Spiritist Council · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

The reason listed for deletion was: "Notability of this organization is not established. Apparent COI edits by User:Ssbaltimore". The International Spiritist Council exists: http://cei.spirite.org/ . It's site is mainly in portuguese. -177.135.231.5 (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. It does not matter that the website is in Portuguese, but for a Wikipedia article it is not enough that the organization exists and has a website: the test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter W. Marty · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 65.101.95.64, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @65.101.95.64: --S Philbrick(Talk)
  19:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Andrew Kojack Kojackton · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Before deleting my page you should tell where to correct myself instead of just deleting it. Let me know where I went wrong so that I can make corrections. Wikipedia should be able to give me a guideline how to make things right. Since I have not offended anyone or made any bad remarks you should be able to guide me.

I wait for your guidance!

Kind regards,

Andrew Kojack Kojackton -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.202.240.12 (talk) 05:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. It is definitely our standard practice to provide an explanation, so if that did not happen, I want to see why. However, I cannot find the article.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

I've found it - it was a user page, User:ANDREW KOJACK KOJACKTON, and you were notified on your talk page here.

Mr Kojackton, I'm sorry that we don't make this clearer to new users at sign-up time, but Wikipedia is not another site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to tell the world about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an

WP:NOTWEBHOST

:

"

Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog

or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emerge Financial Wellness · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 173.14.111.110, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak

20:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Green coast · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gimicom (talk) 12:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC) green coast is a seaside coast in the south of Albania, in the Palasa village. it is not a company. it is a geographic position. in Albanian is Bregu i Gjelbert (like cape verde).

Green coast is not an company. green coast is called the beach near palasa beach in Albania. green coast in Albanian is bregu i gjelbert and is one of the most beautiful beaches in the Albanian riviera. what is here wrong that should be deleted? at leas some information why someone deleted it? sounds very strange to me. please undelete this article so I can work on it with the references. -Gimicom (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. This article would need a complete re-write, because it was written in wildly promotional language: "an oasis of calm... offers a host of activities... a land to be loved... warm hospitality... clean and pristine beaches, spectacular mountains, scenic river valleys... a truly unique blend of Mediterranean flavors... " etc, etc. That is not an encyclopedia article, it is a tourist-office brochure, full of

reliable sources. JohnCD (talk

) 16:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree with your statement but I think it is a bit immature to delete it and not giving some time for editions. it was canceled in just a second right after the publishing. give to people some time to improve. Unedelete it so I can work on it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.71.201 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Have you tried creating a draft in WP:Articles for creation yet? An AfC draft is generally safe from most forms of speedy deletion compared to just putting it in mainspace. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

That's good advice, with the proviso that anything as promotional as what you wrote will be speedily-deleted at sight even in draft or AfC space. For that reason, I will not restore the article - you need to start from a clean sheet and a completely different point of view. Think of yourself not as a tourist-office copywriter trying to attract customers, or an enthusiast encouraging other people to come and share your passion, but as a geographer or an intelligence officer reporting on the area. The reader should have no idea whether you personally think the Green Coast is good or bad. Read

WP:Article Wizard to help you. JohnCD (talk

) 21:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mato Homola · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, OndrejC2, request the undeletion of this

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 22:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arman Mkrtchyan · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Aaaaa2300, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Aaaaa2300: --S Philbrick(Talk)
  01:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Glass Wave · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Belated deprod. -– Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Arms & Hearts: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I would agree with the IP's proposed deletion rationale, so I hope you fix the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Panther (watercar) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

Belated deprod. -– Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. @Arms & Hearts: It needs a lot of work and probably qualifies as a speedy deletion at the moment, Consider requesting that it be moved to a user subpage or the Draft user space.--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Mount of Delta · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Mount of Delta is Owned by Prince Ned Munir Nwoko, He added the name Munir recently when he got converted from Christianity to Islam. His name was mentioned on Arthur Okowa Ifeanyi's page here on Wiki because he lost to Arthur Okowa Ifeanyi in Delta State Nigeria. I am not related to him. I went to visit the mount and loved it, i felt i should let the world know too. I'm new to wiki and i am ready to learn -Listen2star (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

WP:Your first article first. JohnCD (talk

) 08:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Nizar typeface · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article contains general information and why they were deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sultanmaqtari (talk • contribs) 04:20, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

 Not done. @Sultanmaqtari: Wikipedia is not the place to tell the world about your newly-designed typeface - see WP:No original research and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You may find some ideas at WP:Alternative outlets. JohnCD (talk) 09:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Happy Corner

It is a new article being translated and the game is popular in most regions of China. -

 Comment:: A similar article, with the same illustration, was deleted (or rather, turned into a redirect) in 2009 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Corner. I have not time tonight to compare the articles in detail. I will do that tomorrow (unless any other admin likes to decide what to do). JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done The article is sufficiently changed from the earlier one that I think the best course is to restore it and re-nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion to let the community decide. I will wait a week before I do that, to give you some time to improve it. In particular, you need better references to establish WP:Notability, and you need to update the dead links. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• Cab 20 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your I don't understand why this page was suddenly deleted. I was simply providing information on a band that recently became known. The significance of the group was many things from the appearing on the show shark tank, their style, and indie sound. The page was also said to have been deleted because of advertising reasons, when all of the articles were unbiased. The page may have been missing references and citations but this is my first shot at creating a wikipedia page and i was learning as i was creating the page. I chose the smaller band of Cab 20 as my first article to work on to introduce myself to the Wikipedia because they are not globally known or massivly critically acclaimed, so it was not like i was messing with George WAshington's page. They are known which is the reason for them having an article but the are small enough that it is approachable for a first time user to edit the articles and add information. I did make sure to check all information provided such as names, times, locations, titles, and people involved. I do have all of their albums and have read numerous interviews before adding information. Please let me know if the reason's above are not reasons for adding to the wiki and if new users are even really allowed the ability to add new pages. here and then click the "Save page" button below -BlakeInDisguise (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: Of the

fair-use policies. We also can't restore A7s on request for similar reasons. Have you tried going through WP:Articles for creation as opposed to just writing an article from scratch in mainspace? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori!

18:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Done you will find that JohnCD userfied it to User:BlakeInDisguise/Cab 20 Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:47, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
• (
  WP:BAND for the standard you have to show they meet. More advice on your talk page tomorrow. JohnCD (talk
  ) 21:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

• I for one can't see why it was deleted in the first place. I see that some of the templates included the user page into mainspace categories and that's how another user noticed the page itself, but other than that annoyance what's the problem? That a userpage has some templates and what-not which would've otherwise gone unnoticed until the end of time? @
  Tokyogirl79, don't you think "Your best bet here is to just accept that the material has been deleted and edit in a beneficial manner from here on out" is a bit extreme given the situation? They futzed around with their user page, they weren't generating hoaxes or vandalizing articles. Is this how we treat people who break a rule (under a broad interpretation, IMO) they probably didn't know existed? Protonk (talk
  ) 18:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
• I'm sorry, but I can see no good reason for someone to have a userbox created in that manner. The problem is that it's not that they did this once, but several times in the infoboxes. The infobox would show up as linking to various historical events, but would actually be linking to things such as the following: "fail, cumshot, anus, bum, cock, poo, willy" and so on. Why create that? Why create it at all? By most standards that'd be seen as vandalism. I didn't block him because there wasn't really a history of vandalism, but I can't see where he'd really be able to use that in any beneficial manner anywhere on Wikipedia or elsewhere. Maybe he didn't outright state that he was going to try to insert it into one of the articles here on Wikipedia, but it's hard to imagine that this would be used for anything other than vandalism somewhere. We've deleted stuff like this as vandalism and declined to restore them for less than this.
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  04:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm aware of the content of the page. I'm also aware it's a user page, literally the least important and least restricted set of pages on the wiki. And apart from a relatively narrow set of restrictions (which the page didn't really violate, if it was User:Leisure Pirate/Template testing nobody would've batted an eye), we shouldn't waste time policing userspace for venial sins. I wasn't convinced it violated NOTWEB and I'm even less convinced that the user is guilty of vandalism pre-crime. Obviously there's room for disagreement, but imagine that Leisure Pirate just wanted to play with templates. Someone came by and deleted their user page and in asking to have the content restored they were treated like a petulant child who broke a rule and needed to know why they were bad instead of an adult who didn't know we had these rules. If we assume LP is editing in good faith, that's a pretty awful introduction into the community. Protonk (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
  • More to the point, if you're right and LP was building up these templates in preparation for a spree of hoax edits to european countries, we can just revert the eventual edits to mainspace and block the account. Nothing is really lost by restoring the content and nothing is gained by keeping it deleted (with 570 some edits to infoboxes I bet they've got the hang of it). If they're merely experimenting with templates and linking to
    fail/cumshot/etc. because it's more fun than not, then all we've accomplished by asserting they're a vandal in training is piss off a member of the community. In the future when someone brings up Wikipedia in conversation, their experience will be "I broke some obscure rule, then got yelled at for making a contrite request to have my page restored." Protonk (talk
    ) 14:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
    • I agree. If @
      talk
      ) 17:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
• If you promise to watch it like a hawk, go ahead. I just see it as something that'd be inevitably used for trolling.
  (｡◕‿◕｡)
  07:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
  • talk
    ) 15:56, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sporadic late onset nemaline myopathy · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) EdirolUA25 (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

• Southwest Arkansas · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? Also, please do not wikkilink the article name inside the template; the template does that by default. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 21:25, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

 Not done - no, I can't find any trace of such an article either, in AfC space, draft space, anywhere. You will have to tell us the exact title of the deleted page you mean, or the name of the account that created it. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

• WCWC Legacy Championship · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions
  ]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JeffAkin (talk) 02:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Was deleted under A&, belief it was about an event, etc. It is about a championship that is tied to s msjor, independent wrestling promotion. Not an event, but part of a regionally televised program.

 Not done - this does not seem to be

WP:Notability (summary)0 to warrant a stand-alons article. It has been redirected to the main West Coast Wrestling Connection where it can be described. JohnCD (talk

) 10:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Special K Software · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 72.37.171.196, request the undeletion of this

 Not done. This was restored last December after a similar request, but was then left untouched. I will restore it again only if you give a definite assurance that this time you do actually intend to work on it. JohnCD (talk) 09:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• The Red Door Casino Online · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Could you please explain why the page was deleted I provided content and references as I was building page and recieved first notice before it was finished then I finished page page and now I cannot find the info I provided or coould even save to update all that coding is now gone -Mar Vance (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Probably because it fails our

notability requirements for businesses, and is thus ineligible to be in an encyclopedia the panda ₯’

00:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@

relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. JohnCD (talk

) 10:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• Nanowar of Steel · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I can understand why this article was deleted in 2008. But six years later, the band has 3 albums. They have gained a fair amount of notability worldwide among metal fans. The article has 8 interwikis, each having a few references in their own language. Here are some references.

• http://www.truemetal.it/cont/articolo/into-gay-pride-ride/58872/1.html
• http://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Nanowar_of_Steel/3540261755
• http://www.metal-integral.com/chronique.do?chronique_ID=2169&groupe=nanowar&album=into-gay-pride-ride
• http://www.metalstorm.net/pub/review.php?review_id=8747
• http://blackwindmetal.com/nanowar-of-steel-a-knight-at-the-opera/
• http://www.metal-temple.com/site/catalogues/entry/reviews/cd_3/n_2/nanowar-of-steel-a.htm
• http://www.spirit-of-metal.com/groupe-groupe-Nanowar_Of_Steel-l-en.html -Dodoïste (talk) 00:42, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@

WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk

) 08:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks ! I'll do my best (I'm not a native english speaker and I'm usually editing fr.wiki). Dodoïste (talk) 14:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beer in Edinburgh · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

• @
  CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk)
  15:30, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 129.93.64.8, request the undeletion of this

• CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk)
  15:33, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• Jan Emmet Yngson · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I,JeanGan , request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. I don't understand.. it says FREE ENCYCLOPEDIA.. why are you need to delete it? this wikipedia is only for an actor or some kind of famous people? please give me a reason so that i can understand.. -JeanGan (talk) 17:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it's ONLY for articles about

notable people. the panda ₯’

18:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk

) 21:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Popi Marden: Abstract Artist · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am collecting contributors before re-submission and they are very slow with their contributions but this is a great man worth the time to create a great article of historical proportions... please have 6 months more of patience for Bruce "Popi" Marden... thank you -209.179.72.54 (talk) 20:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk

) 22:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• File:Nanowar of steel.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Following the restoration of the article Nanowar of Steel this monday morning, I request the restoration of its unfree logo. Thanks, Dodoïste (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC) -Dodoïste (talk) 21:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

• Ashley Newbrough · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Friedamay91 (talk) 05:43, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Ashley Newbrough is a working actress. In 2013- 2014 Ashley recurred on ABC's summer guilty pleasure Mistresses as Kyra, Harry's (Brett Tucker ) fun loving young girlfriend. Ashley was a leading actress, Sage Baker, in the critically acclaimed CW Privileged with her costars Lucy Hale and Joanna Garcia.

Lulahiinthesky is her Instagam/twitter

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SHIM · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions
  ]

CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. GB fan

12:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

• Abhaya_Kshethram · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I need this article back to live. Since article is about a famous NGO in india, which also got awards from APJ Abdul Kalam, Former President of India -Heykarthikwithu (talk) 10:12, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

administrator who carried out the deletion, user Yunshui (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. GB fan

13:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

• Numeer Nabi · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

article has notability sources and has enough refrences and plus addition of improvement tag has been added "Save page" button below -Artistcare12 (talk) 13:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

proposed for deletion, but you removed the PROD template, as you were quite entitled to do. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk

) 13:17, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

• articles for creation before it does get deleted. the panda ₯’
  13:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

• Afro-Eurasia-America · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This article should be I deleted to discuss information on Afro-Eurasia before the Bering Strait disappeared. as such I recommend the resurrection of this fine article in order to achieve this, for such to happen in the year of our lord two thousand and fourteen. May Christ be with you -Pablothepenguin (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

 Not done The article was deleted by consensus at

original research. §FreeRangeFrog^croak

17:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

• Ian Holt · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ianholtwriter (talk) 15:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

 Not done What little content there was there is inappropriate for a biography. If you wish to write an article about yourself, please use

Articles for creation. §FreeRangeFrog^croak

19:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)