Wikipedia:Scientific peer review/Invasive species

Invasive species

Does this article meet the scientific understanding of invasive species? It seems to be extensively cited with plenty of examples. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 05:23, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Consider adding more
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article may need to undergo
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 13:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Bisognerebbe correggere red links --A cool night green owl 17:56, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on work done

• All citations now in-line and meta. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 22:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Place non-breaking space where appropriate
• Conformed to
  WP:FOOTNOTE
• modified lead per
  Wikipedia:Lead section Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 23:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider adding more
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article may need to undergo
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 12:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]