Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr. Tariq Nayfeh/Archive

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.



Dr. Tariq Nayfeh

Dr. Tariq Nayfeh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date April 28 2009, 01:08 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets



Evidence submitted by Dawn Bard (talk)


User:Dr. Tariq Nayfeh was blocked earlier today for edit-warring and deleting sourced content without explanation on Physician: [1], [2], [3] (and more), at Osteotomy, including [4], [5] (and more). User:Mtpisaman has since shown up and repeatedly reverted back to User:Dr. Tariq Nayfeh's edits, including: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

Seems obvious to me. Could an admin block the sock please? CanadianNine 01:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
 Clerk note: Sock tagged, archiving. — Jake Wartenberg 02:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date April 28 2009, 11:16 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Verbal chat


User was blocked yesterday and found to be using the sockpuppet Mtpisaman (talk · contribs). Another editor has appeared reverting to these editors preferred versions, called Nuxxagle (talk · contribs). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Dr._Tariq_Nayfeh/Archive for previous case. Also see 149.68.105.207 (talk · contribs), same behaviour as other accounts. Verbal chat 11:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot about DeLaughterDO (talk · contribs), who has been blocked for a short period for edit warring the same edits as the accounts above. Verbal chat 11:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be ongoing, (Vespearez251 (talk · contribs)) probably needs an IP (range?) block and some attention. Verbal chat 11:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And Prdentiol (talk · contribs) Verbal chat 13:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
I blocked
t/c) 11:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: Fixed the tagging on all accounts blocked to link here. Also, CU did not confirm in this case as far as I can tell. Synergy 16:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

No-brainer--all blocked indef, plus Nuxxagle (

96 13:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Please tag and archive —— nixeagleemail me 16:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]





Dr. Tariq Nayfeh

Dr. Tariq Nayfeh (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date June 10 2009, 19:32 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by Verbal chat

Reverting to same version of the article as Dr. Tariq Nayfeh and his sockpuppets. Passes (fails?) the

WP:DUCK test. Verbal chat 19:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

New user whose first and only edits to physician page, revert/edit warrior and refused to use the talk page. Fuzbaby (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr. Tariq Nayfeh/Archive; I would say that Dr. Tariq Nayfeh is the puppetmaster, and Sogsw is just a(nother) puppet. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I got them backwards in the form - sorry about that. Can a clerk fix? Verbal chat 20:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's a big deal - I just wanted to make sure that the link to the other SPI was here for the admins to see. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 Clerk note: Mered from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sogsw. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Note: Blocked and tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Report date June 11 2009, 15:33 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Verbal chat

Continuing yesterdays socking, same edit, same edit summary.

WP:DUCK Verbal chat 15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

Adding

quack, quack. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

 Done PeterSymonds (talk) 15:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Blocked and tagged. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]