Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Migosyrn/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Migosyrn

Migosyrn (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

02 August 2015

Suspected sockpuppets

I believe we are dealing with ducks. Personally requested an admin to deal with repeated vandalism from

Quack quack. Requesting checkuser as account creation history shows continuous disruption from the sockmaster. Sockmaster has also vowed to carry on disruption: [2]. Optakeover(Talk) 17:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Added User:Migosyrnomnipresent. Vandalised my talk page. Adding User:Migosyrnsupremeallah. Sockmaster still active as of this account creation. Optakeover(Talk) 07:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

78.179.99.35 suspected due to reverting my revert of M3 at 3. 2602:306:BD41:E1A0:29FF:EAF9:1CC7:ED22 suspected due to reverting the revert of Mtrill at 4. Optakeover(Talk) 16:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I would add Make Zzuzz go Zzzzz (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), which was around the same time, but possibly related elsewhere. Request a checkuser to see if a range can be taken out. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Migosyrnfleek (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), which has been vandalising this SPI, now semi'd in anticipation of more migosyrns. Bishonen | talk 09:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

  • I have asked Slakr to create an abuse filter that blocks an account from being created if it contains "Migosyrn" in it. Thank you, --ceradon (talk • edits) 10:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention - to look for possible sleepers, and to block underlying IP. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • CU makes all the named accounts  Likely (except Make Zzuzz go Zzzzz, who's on a different continent and appears Red X Unrelated) but isn't a great deal of use for sleeper hunting; he's clearly switching his router to get a new IP for each sock. The range is also too great for a rangeblock; this is going to have to be a flag, tag and bag deal for each one. Yunshui 雲水 12:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


06 September 2015

Suspected sockpuppets


I suggest that User:‎Themigcannotbestopped is a sock of User:Traphouseiii. The latter was indefinitely blocked at 14:45; User:mig's account was created at ‎15:18. They have both focused on vandalising User:Noq's talk and user pages, and demonstrate the same attitude and use of language.

For example, from User:Traphouseiii: "The truth about noq - I like nob" here
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Noq&diff=prev&oldid=679745637

And "I am a nobhead" here
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Noq&diff=679744879&oldid=630947625

And then from User:‎Themigcannotbestopped:
"I have been marked by the Mig clan for being a sad stalker with no life"
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Noq&diff=679750193&oldid=679746117

Although both accounts have now been indefinitely blocked, I have requested a technical investigation as I believe it is not at all unlikely that there are other socks or a puppeteer to be found.

Imperatrix Mundi 16:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • The master account is User:Migosyrn-- please merge with that SPI. Hopefully a range block or proxy block could do some good here. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hahaha, seems that you're all noticing how we're back in full effect! Also note
    Imperatrix Mundi 09:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@
Imperatrix Mundi 14:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

18 September 2015

Suspected sockpuppets

see contributions Stephenb (Talk) 13:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 September 2015

Suspected sockpuppets

another Stephenb (Talk) 14:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 September 2015

Suspected sockpuppets

Change History Stephenb (Talk) 13:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

09 September 2015

Suspected sockpuppets


Obvious vandal, autoblock is teh fail. --slakr\ talk / 23:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@
Amanda (aka DQ) 04:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@DeltaQuad: Copied over. I mainly put it in Quick ideally to expedite it (since apparently admins can't self-endorse obvious things like this and the attack was ongoing). slakr\ talk / 05:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Spotaggin (talk · contribs) seems to be another sockpuppet of this person. KSFTC 02:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A few more from today
All blocked but listed here for completeness. Nthep (talk) 14:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Note — copied from quick checkuser request after completion per request / for recordkeeping. --slakr\ talk / 05:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Amanda (aka DQ) 05:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    @DeltaQuad: What are we waiting here to happen? Vanjagenije (talk) 09:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @DeltaQuad: Any update? NativeForeigner Talk 09:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I apologize, I simply forgot about this case. From what I can tell right now (as I can't find my original notes),  Confirmed:
It's likely every acocunt originally listed was related to a point of being confirmed, otherwise I would have said something, but of course I can't verify that. Blocks to stop further issues were put in place at the time. --
Amanda (aka DQ) 02:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

15 January 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

WP:DUCK edit history speaks for itself Nthep (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Probably not the last addition to this page today. Nthep (talk) 16:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I was right. Nthep (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All blocked already. Nthep (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • May wish to include User:U-Tan Kuuuran, trolling started (for me anyway) yesterday after rolling that account back various times for vandalism [3], see also my User Talkpage History starting January 15th 15:50 [4]. The contribs of this one mirror those of the other three trolling my user page and which are mentioned already above: Meffodmayne, contribs [5], Gfkghostdeini [6], and Goldenarmsthepoweru [7]. The edits from this account quite well resemble those of these three others, for example [8] on my Usertalkpage. Horseless Headman (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]
A table to organise all the above Usernames salad.
Username Creation Edits Blocked
Migosyrn 30July2015 (21:58) none 30July2015 (22:02). See SP Archive.
Nazteenaz 10Jan2016 (20:15) 10Jan 20:18-20:29 (8x) 10Jan2016 (20:31)
Utankuran 10Jan2016 (20:56) 10Jan 20:57-21:10 (22x) 10Jan2016 (21:09)
Methicalman 10Jan2016 (21:14) 10Jan 21:15-21:16 (6x) 10Jan2016 (21:16)
Thefiremenbet 10Jan2016 (21:34) 10Jan 21:34-21:41 (16x) 10Jan2016 (21:41, +22:40inf)
Bodoodoodoo 10Jan2016 (21:51) 10Jan 21:52-21:57 (13x) 10Jan2016 (21:57)
Dirtmcgirtee1 10Jan2016 (22:20) 10Jan 22:21-22:29 (18x) 10Jan2016 (22:29)
Shaolinsfinest 10Jan2016 (22:31) 10Jan 22:32-22:39 (11x) 10Jan2016 (22:35)
U-Tan Kuuuran 15Jan2016 (15:44) 15Jan 15:45-15:59 (23x) 15Jan2016 (16:01)
Meffodmayne 15Jan2016 (16:04) 15Jan 16:04-16:15 (20x) 15Jan2016 (16:15)
Wu Y.. Dales Ripper 15Jan2016 (16:19) 15Jan 16:20-16:21 (5x) 15Jan2016 (16:21)
Gfkghostdeini 15Jan2016 (16:23) 15Jan 16:24-16;25 (6x) 15Jan2016 (16:25)
Goldenarms... 15Jan2016 (16:27) 15Jan 16:28-16:33 (7x) 15Jan2016 (16:33)
Liquidswords... 15Jan2016 (16:35) 15Jan 16:35 (2x) 15Jan2016 (16:36)
Uzipinkyringg 15Jan2016 (16:47 15Jan 16:48 (2x) 15Jan2016 (16:48)
Returntothe36 16Jan2016 (16:41) 16Jan 16:48-16:49 (8x) 16Jan2016 (16:49)
Oldirtyasonunique 16Jan2016 (16:56) 16Jan 17:00-17:02 (10x) 16Jan2016 (17:03)
Rzarectorgrav.. 16Jan2016 (17:07) 16Jan 17:09-17:14 (13x) 16Jan2016 (17:15)
  • Each "new" Username can technically have been created upon blocking the "old" one. Perhaps not strict SPs (active alongside), but definitely repeated (endless?) account creations to continue the same disruptive behaviour. There may still be additional Usernames around.
  • Personal harassment / threats, of similar wordings / nature, often by more than one of these accounts on User talkpages, e.g. mine (as said above) or here [19] for 16 Jan.
  • If I saw this correctly, not a single edit that has not been rolled back. All accounts blocked, either for vandalism and/or recognised SP by blocking admin. Accounts typically have a high editing frequency, and after an edit typically directly jumping to another page (see contribs). Various pages keep on coming back between Usernames, as can be seen in the user compare thingy. Horseless Headman (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Thank you for your work,
    WP:DENY. It's not as if a checkuser is needed. Bishonen | talk 12:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC).[reply
    ]
  •  Clerk endorsed - Please, look for sleepers and, if possible, block his IP range. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Didn't find any sleepers. Ranges that were in use have already been handled. Elockid Message me 15:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

25 May 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious sock, and blocked. @Vanjagenije: Might a sleeper check be warranted, since it's been some months? GABgab 20:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Similar edits to other socks e.g. addition of {{User BNP}} to user pages, various threats on user talk pages. All blocked already. Nthep (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • No sleepers were found last time. I don't think it's needed. Case closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Migosyrn/Archive&oldid=1138675325"