Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rosanacurso/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Rosanacurso

Rosanacurso (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
13 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tea_%28meal%29&action=history http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tea_%28meal%29&action=history

Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I think CU might be beneficial in this SPI to confirm UA and/or IPs. Perhaps a sleeper check as well. --

hockey10 e-mail 18:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Please may you explain why you submitted this case? ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 18:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you are asking me why.... It appears that there are about 30 sock puppets disrupting
WP:SOCK. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:52, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks, I checked the contribs and I saw that but just to know exactly why you posted this Investigation. ~~Awsome EBE123~~(talk | Contribs) 18:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How long does this take? JuanfraNY is still active, having moved to the Green tea talk page. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Green_tea&diff=prev&oldid=418913722 Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And there's a new one, Lsanchezs01 Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • It's painfully obvious I am asking for an IP block and sleeper check here. I'd say start blocking now as ducks. --
    (t) (e) 18:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Checking this was a mess, but here are the results:

 Confirmed as each other:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Confirmed as each other and  Possible as Rosanacurso:

 Likely as Rosanacurso

All others listed in the original list of reported socks which I did not mention are  Possible and going to  Likely when factoring in behavioral evidence and edit patterns; that pertains to all of the accounts reported in this case. The guy is clearly wardriving, as he is searching out different various wi-fi networks in the same geographical location with several different devices. The technical evidence is a bitch to look at, but I think it's much to look at this with the behavioral evidence and see that they are all the same person. In other words, I would block 'em all. –MuZemike 23:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

16 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

--

hockey10 e-mail 22:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Thanks, everyone, but there is a new one.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tea_(meal)&curid=19337173&diff=419156475&oldid=419070404

Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've gotten DeltaQuad to archive the old case and I've re-added the unblocked sockpuppets to "clean-up" the case page. --
hockey10 e-mail 22:51, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Almost identical pattern of editing (Encarna10, Aneeceiza, Tamara.suarez.alumno.ite), preoccupation with Iberian matters and the UK, and disruptive discussion instigation at

WT:FOOD. Pyrope 00:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]


Note that I keep on adding SPs to this list, even after HelloAnnyong blocked some of them. The problem is ongoing and has not stopped or slowed down. It is just spreading to other Talk pages. If anyone has a better idea of where to report this, please let me know. They do not seem interested at AIV. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:46, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
There is not going to be a rangeblock possible here. As I said in the previous SPI case, the user is wardriving, which involves different ISP and networks, with IPs all over the entire CIDR spectrum. –MuZemike 19:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I just put on my Clerk hat and changed this to declined per MuZemike. KnightLago (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Closing this due to socks being blocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there is a list of a dozen that haven't been blocked. Contacting HelloAnnyong to see what he ment. --
(t) (e) 13:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Personally, I think it might be somewhat beneficial for a CU to be involved in this case as if the user is wardriving, the IPs should be in the same geographical area. --

hockey10 e-mail 02:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

That won't tell us anything. When your moving around from Cafe to Cafe you could catch anyone for just being in the same city and we could get a lot of collaterial damage by trying that. Then watch the AUSC/BAS come after someone for trying this. :P --
(t) (e) 02:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
19 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

additional SPs showing same behavioral pattern as previous ~50 SPs of Rosanacurso. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:58, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
20 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous socks. Maybe it is slowing down though! Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • information Administrator note Both blocked and tagged. I wouldn't be too optimistic just yet, though. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:58, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
21 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
22 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Could I suggest an autoprotect for WT:WikiProject Food and drink/to do? It has been hit multiple times, it is still attracting SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Socks blocked. One underlying IP CU-blocked. –MuZemike 16:28, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

22 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 20:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
24 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as previous socks. Could I also request that Talk:Tea (meal) is semiprotected again? The protection lapsed today and the page has already been hit twice--this page gets hit more than any other. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Talk:Tea (meal) semi-protected 1 month. Please keep watching the Sandbox. –MuZemike 16:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

25 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note All blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 20:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



26 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Semi-protect Talk:Public House? Has been hit three times. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked. I don't think there is enough right now to semi-protect

Talk:Public house. –MuZemike 20:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]



27 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
29 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
30 March 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


01 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note Blocked. Elockid (Talk) 19:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

02 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
03 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other SPs. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
03 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
03 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 22:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
05 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

MuZemike (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Elockid (Alternate) (Talk) 18:53, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

06 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Banned user is still here--same behavior. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • Any other pins we should knock out? --
    (t) (e) 21:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Yes, that is Rosanacurso, alright. That article may also need to be semi-protected if the disruption continues. May I also add to please check the user's edits for

copyright violations and RevDelete them if need be; it is of my observation that this person does not know English. –MuZemike 22:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

07 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:22, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • Blocked by MuZemike. --
    (t) (e) 17:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
    ]
08 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note Blocked and tagged. Elockid (Talk) 20:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

10 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Pyrope 21:15, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
13 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Note that a previous sock was named Cursotic. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

And tagged. --
hockey10 e-mail 14:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]


14 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
No sleepers found, underlying  IP blocked. Courcelles 18:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
15 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:17, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

All users blocked and tagged. --

hockey10 e-mail 22:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
16 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
17 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Al igual que otros socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

CalderonLillyA is Red X Unrelated. However, Juanfran2009 and IsabelGG (talk · contribs) are clearly and unambiguously socks of Rosanacurso. Moreover, I have semi-protected Tea (meal) for an additional month for continued disruption. –MuZemike 20:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also blocked is Tarea2 (talk · contribs). –MuZemike 20:06, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two more added. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note copyright violations from User:Canadenca. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note copyright violations from User:Kakayy. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

no Declined – Obvious socks are obvious. All we can do is continue to block and tag and semi-protect. –MuZemike 20:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note All other unblocked accounts are now blocked. Elockid (Talk) 19:20, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Blocked and tagged. –MuZemike 02:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

23 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same behavior as other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
25 April 2011
Suspected sockpuppets


Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Same name as previous block sock, Canadenca, also concerned with British foods. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
09 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Similar pattern of edits as other socks: sandboxes, WikiProject pages, and interest in tea/tea the meal, with just slightly inappropriate edits. Last time, the socks started on Tea (meal) as well. Somewhat similar name to other socks. Also, like many of the other socks, was first registered on eswiki. Coincidentally, Rosanacurso started in March 2011, one year ago. Last time, Rosanacurso and dozens of socks made hundreds of edits over weeks. Let's catch this one early. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Unfortunately, all of the data in the archive is  Stale. TNXMan 14:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

09 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


Similar edits (sandbox, project page, tea-related, British food) to other socks, with just slightly off-topic content. Similar name (Ite) to many other socks. Like many other socks, also started on eswiki. See entry on Irenita84 for further comments. Let's do something about this one early. Last March, there were hundreds of SP edits of this kind (see archive). Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

As expected from before, Rosanacurso is wardriving again, so nothing can be accomplished by CU'ing. However, obvious socks are obvious, so I have blocked them. --MuZemike 00:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

11 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


same pattern as other socks: tea, sandboxes, England vs Spain. Request semi-protection of Tea (meal) and Talk:Tea (meal). Last March we had several hundred edits of this type. Let's nip it in the bud. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Done – sock is also blocked. --MuZemike 00:17, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


11 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

similar behavior as other socks: sandboxes, off-topic comments on obscure talk pages, British topics. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I have blocked Manelmoreno, but I am not certain on Ciorolp, so I have left that account unblocked for the time being. --MuZemike 17:14, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Translating the above, that is most certainly Rosanacurso and has been indefinitely blocked. --MuZemike 17:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


11 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

tagging same page as previous sock, still on tea in England. Request semi-protection of

Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/tasks which has now been attacked twice Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
12 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

like other socks: sandbox and tea Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
14 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Same pattern as other socks: sandboxes, tea time, British culture. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


15 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

sandboxes and Britain (London), slightly off-topic comment on Talk page Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

similar name to other socks, use of sandboxes, off-topic comment on Talk page related to cuisine Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


18 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

tea and sandboxes Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

All socks have been blocked and tagged. --MuZemike 22:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

19 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

same pattern: sandboxes and British cuisine/beverages. Suggest semi-protection of

Talk:Public house, which was also hit last year. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  • On hold - no diffs presented. We don't have time to work through individual requests if no specific evidence is presented, sorry! The Cavalry (Message me) 17:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no Declined – Just block the darn socks and protect whatever needs to be protected. Rosanacurso wardrives all over Spain, so there is no purpose in doing any checking. --MuZemike 18:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Account already blocked, so I'll mark for close. Please do keep filing the cases though, as it is good to keep all the data in one place. TNXMan 19:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
20 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. Same pattern: sandboxes and off-topic edits to Talk pages for British culture Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Sock blocked, marking for close. TNXMan 16:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


20 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

See contrib. Same pattern as other socks: sandboxes and British cuisine. Request semi-protection of Talk: Public House due to repeated vandalism (second hit in two days). Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Sock blocked, marking for close. TNXMan 16:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


22 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. Sandboxes and Talk pages on British cuisine topics Logical Cowboy (talk) 20:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


25 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

see contribs. Tea time, sandboxes, and Spain--like other socks. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


26 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

See contribs. Same as previous socks, sandboxes and British culture. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

All blocked, marking for close. TNXMan 14:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

29 March 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious sock: See contribs. Talk pages, British vs Spanish cuisine. Request semi-protection of Talk: Fish and Chips as it has been repeatedly hit. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Confirmed by MuZemike,
    (ʞlɐʇ) 12:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]
23 April 2012
Suspected sockpuppets


See contribs. Similar pattern of edits (sandbox, Talk page comments that do not refer to article, comparisons of English and Spanish cuisine and culture) to previous socks. Previously hit Talk page. Logical Cowboy (talk) (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

information Administrator note Blocked (not checked). Elockid (Talk) 22:57, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Rosanacurso/Archive&oldid=1079420480"