Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2008/July/5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete cats & upmerge tpls

• Cat:American journalist, 1900s birth stubs
• Cat:American journalist, 1910s birth stubs
• Cat:American journalist, 1920s birth stubs
• Cat:American journalist, 1930s birth stubs
• Cat:American journalist, 1970s birth stubs
• Cat:American journalist, 1980s birth stubs
• Cat:American journalist, 1990s birth stubs

All undersized (some absurdly so), unproposed, and unnecessary. Upmerge. Maybe we really do need those "yes, we did mean this to be this way!" comments on all those templates after all. Alai (talk) 02:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upmerge per nom unless easily populable. BTW, I regularly use such messages (have a look at, say Palau-geo-stub). Grutness...wha? 01:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know, hence the comment. Alai (talk) 02:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.