Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/LordPathogen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read thisfor detailed instructions.
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
LordPathogen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
MindHavoc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
129.33.49.251 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
evrik (talk) 13:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
MindHavoc is a single-issue sock on a campaign for where LordPathogen was trying to make NPOV edits. In the last year LordPathogen has only edited on four articles: Lou Dobbs Tonight, Lou Dobbs, Illegal immigration and Elvira Arellano. The Elvira Arellano is where MindHavoc started editing in the same style as LP and then started reverting other users changes. --evrik (talk) 13:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- So, because I have not edited many articles, and when I did, I happen to agree with with an opponent of Evrik's, THAT makes me a sock puppet? If this were the 16th century, Evrik would probably burn me at the stake with such evidence. ;-) LordPathogen 129.33.49.251 14:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ummm, looking at you just wrote, are you writing in the voice of User:LordPathogen, User:MindHavoc or just 129.33.49.251? --evrik (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvously LordPathogen since my name is at the top of this page and hence am the accused. As for the IP, that belongs to a large corporation so it would not surprise me if it used by multiple wiki users. Really, try writing persuasive arguments rather than throwing out lame accusations... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 10:01, 24 May 2007 editing as LordPathogen
- Sounds to me like you were writing as MindHavoc and defending LordPathogen. --evrik (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, I'm done writing here so feel free to accuse me of what you will. I request immediate judgement if possible. After that, I would like to know what the penalty is for falsely accusing someone here... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.33.49.251 (talk • contribs) 10:04, 24 May 2007 editing as LordPathogen
- Why are you signing in such an odd fashion? --evrik (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I just made a report here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR --evrik (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
I have blocked User:MindHavoc as that account is clearly a sockpuppet of LordPathogen, whom I also blocked for 48h as a result of a 3RR vio. I have not blocked 129.33.49.251 as that user's editing history began in March 2 and I cannot find sufficient evidence to identify this IP as another sockpuppet. Signaturebrendel 20:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I concur. ·:·Will Beback ·:· 04:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there any relation with this and ]
- Subsequent annotation No, that's a different puppet master. I'm familiar with Primetime and there is no connection. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]