Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Numberman3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the

read this

for detailed instructions.

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Numberman3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Numberman1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Numberman2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Numberman4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

_→AzaToth 18:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

All edit summaries are only consisting of rising numbers, for example Numberman3's edit on my talk page had the summary "33"

Comments

No, I know these people. I have asked them to stop. The others are impersonating me. I have a right to leave any edit summary I want provided my edits are constructive. I use numbers to keep track of my edits. I will nominate myself to be an admin with the edit summary 5000. --Numberman3 18:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that.--Bongwarrior 18:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I do think they will stop. Just as further evidence, all of the other three's blocks were autoblocked, so I would be too if they were socks. --Numberman3 18:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly for you'r case, Numberman1 made edits before Numberman3 :)

If you want to keep track of how many edits you have, there's a much easier way... — iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get why Numberman3 removed Numberman4's comment from Numberman4's talk page: [1] -- The very model of a minor general 21:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was reverting his changes. I got that one by mistake. -Numberman3 19:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Numberman3 is indef blocked. --Akhilleus (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]