Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ryoung122 (2nd)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user,
read this
for detailed instructions.

User:Ryoung122 (2nd)

Suspected sockpuppeteer

Ryoung122 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

StanPrimmer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

StanPrimmer's only edit so far is this one to the

Robert Young (longevity claims researcher)) is a member of the Gerontology Research Group, and a passionate defender of articles in any way related to it. The verbose style of the contribution is somewhat more organised than that of Young, so it might be a slightly chilled Young, or alternatively his colleague Stan Primmer (see http://www.grg.org/resources/SRFSPrimmer1.htm). If it is the real Primmer, doesn't this fit the definition of meatpupptery? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: the second contribution [1] has common "cut and paste" style, (e.g. the bit about the three documents) which are common to both edits, yet really appropriate to neither point. This pattern matches the User:Ryoung122 editing style. Pete.Hurd 01:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ryoung122

Comments

If you check the IP address you'll see that this is NOT a sockpuppet. It's not even from the same state.131.96.70.143 02:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions: Blocked as an obvious sockpuppet. Maxim 01:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The irony. A real person accused and blocked as an "obvious sockpuppet," by two bunches of anonymous electrons calling themselves "Maxim" and "BrownHairedGirl." LOL. Dr. Coles and I both have peer reviewed publications in gerontology, available on PUBMED. How many do the both of YOU have? So what makes you think either of you know what the devil you're talking about, here? Inquiring minds want to know. You couldn't deal with refs with quotes from Coles in the L.A. Times about his field? So you're going to go after the messenger? Well, you put your foot in it. S B H arris 02:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]