Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 April 23

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< April 22 April 24 >

April 23, 2006

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, kept Circeus 00:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indiancopyright

Template:Indiancopyright (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

  • Delete. Another "all rights reserved" copyright template. --Carnildo 22:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom and above. You don't need to be too specific with copyrights. --Domthedude001 01:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The images belonging to
    Victor.P.Das 09:01, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy redirected by User:Constantine Evans. Circeus 16:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User United Kingdom resident

Template:User United Kingdom resident (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
)
This userbox was created to provide a temporary solution to a problem that has since been solved. That has basically made this userbox extraneous. Mal 21:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from AfD Morgan Wick 00:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted/salted per

CSD:G4. — xaosflux Talk 12:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Template:Uncyclopedia

Template:Uncyclopedia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Successfully nominated for deletion multiple times in the past. For some reason it keeps getting re-created, this is the 4th time. Prior discussions

here. Stbalbach 19:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 00:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Newinfobox Digimon

Template:Newinfobox Digimon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Originally created by User:Plau as a fork of {{Infoboxneeded}}, then subsequently used by myself as a sandbox to convert {{Infobox Digimon}} to conditionals. Can now use deletion. Circeus 17:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I did some improvements on
    Ligulem 11:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 00:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Technical2

Template:Technical2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs
)
This template is a near copy of the {{technical}} template. Does not add anything which couldn't be dealt with on the talk page of an article. AlyM 10:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep Circeus 00:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Utverylong

Template:Utverylong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Not the most helpful template. The appropriate length for a user talk page (the intended recipient of this template) is for that particular user to decide; if you feel strongly enough about it, leave a message, not a template. If it's any other talk page, archive it yourself. Delete.

E@ 08:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

I'm curious why the two of you have called it useful, yet there are no links to it, either direct or via subst. Who exactly is this useful to?
E@ 06:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
Hence the other reasons I listed above.
E@ 07:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 00:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Manifold

Template:Manifold (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
This template has been made redundant by a new template (

Template:Baxter) and is therefore no longer needed. Lcarsdata Talk | E-mail | My Contribs 16:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 00:43, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HealthDisclaimer

Template:HealthDisclaimer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Directly goes against

Wikipedia:No disclaimer templates guidelines. JoshuaZ 21:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep and change/delete the guidelines. See the reasons at Template_talk:HealthDisclaimer/Reasons. ackoz 22:11, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Disclaimers in specific articles increase Wikipedia's liability: if some articles have disclaimers, then any article that does not have a disclaimer can be assumed by the reader to not need one. And to make matters worse, articles without disclaimers are also the ones more likely to get the reader in trouble -- if someone's gone to the effort of adding a disclaimer to an article, they've probably also gone to the effort of making sure the article is reasonably accurate. --Carnildo 22:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please DO read the reasons I have listed before you reply. Your reasoning is a classic example of ignorance, because I suggested that: 1. All articles (not just some) should have a VISIBLE disclaimer (special for medical cases) and 2. the main concern are the articles which are in constant edit war and changed to non-VS R frequently. You are actually discussing nonexistent arguments. ackoz 22:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did read your reasons. I'm rather less than impressed by them. What's the appropriate disclaimer for
J2000.0? --Carnildo 22:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]
I understand it is Wikipedia:General disclaimer.Geni 00:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_23&oldid=1146585776"