Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 April 27

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.

Template:Japan infobox

Template:Japan infobox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Delete, If every article had it's own infobox... Wikipedia would need a huge cleanup. But they don't, and this template shouldnt be anymore special than all the other ones. --Dominic 04:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per Dominic. ILovEPlankton 00:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it is also not used on the main Japan page.--Andrew c 02:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirected to {{

• Delete and to {{
  talk/contribs/email 15:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep and tag as deprecated (with {{
  Tdeprecated}}?); the likelihood of this being re-created by a well-meaning citizen is relatively high I think. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and Replace all the articles that have this template with {{
  Cleanup-date}}. --Dominic 04:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and replace Per dominic. ILovEPlankton 00:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Too much process. I'm just going to be bold and redirect to {{Cleanup}}. Mangojuice^talk 22:53, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Done. I had to remove the TFD notice to do it. If anyone objects, they can put it back but I really don't see the point in the debate. Mangojuice^talk 22:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep of course. This is what is most commonly put on the article itself by an editor, then Pearle changes it to cleanup-date for sorting. --Rory096 04:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just realized that it wasn't always a redirect to cleanup; I thought {{cleanup}} was on TfD! --Rory096 04:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and delete.

Template:NY-bt

Template:NY-bt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Redundant to {{

• Delete per nom --larsinio (poke)^(prod) 13:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Delete. {{
  NYC Bridge}}, then delete the redundant template. --CComMack 23:35, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to and Delete as stated above. Best solution. --Dominic 04:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge. The operators are important.--Jusjih 11:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and delete Per CCoMack. ILovEPlankton 00:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.

Template:OSPALeague

Template:OSPALeague (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Redundant per

• Delete per
  (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Per nom. ILovEPlankton 00:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.

Template:Japan map

Template:Japan map (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete. It's a copyright tag that basically says "I don't know what the copyright on this image is, but I'm uploading it anyway on the off-chance that it's a free license". We don't need that sort of image, and we don't need this tag. --Carnildo 06:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --
  (talk) 10:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. --Dominic 04:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]