Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete. G8 by User:Phantomsteve. --Michael Greiner 01:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:StateofOrigin player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

template is supposed to link to player profiles however the site no longer seems to provide them and it just links to an online store. noq (talk) 20:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per
  G8. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NavboxOddBG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

the only one left of a series of outdated templates which used to populate Category:Navigational box helper templates. we now have css and {{navbox}} which takes care of this automatically. Frietjes (talk) 18:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 21:21, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:N Jakarta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:S Jakarta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:E Jakarta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:W Jakarta (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by {{Jakarta}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:32, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The new template is clearly superior and the four old ones are unused and no longer needed. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 16:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject East Carolina University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is no longer needed. This project has been inactive for a long time. In addition this project and its parent North Carolina are now supported by the WikiProject United States template.

• delete as no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy, seems to be a reasonable compromise. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RetiredForLong (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is redundant to Template:Retired, with the exception that there is a vague definition of "a long time" included instead of simply saying that the user is no longer active. Further retired implies they are gone for good (because everyone who retires never comes back, right? Is that crickets I hear?). Not active for a long time implies a long Wikibreak, not retiring. kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:59, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy to creator & only user,
  Salvidrim! 03:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Comment - I see no harm in users creating their own customized templates in their own userspace; evidently enough, I have a few of those myself.

  Salvidrim! 13:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Userfy. This seems the best way to both respect Yasht101's intent and to reduce redundancy in the template namespace. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 06:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redundant and antithetic. --MisterGugaruz (talk) 06:25, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note Yasht already has a contingency plan in place in case it gets deleted, a note at the bottom asking for it to be replaced with {{retired}}. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 07:03, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject West Virginia University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is no longer needed. WikiProject WVU went inactive a while ago and there are no articles associated to this template. The articles and project now fall under the scope of WikiProjects West Virginia and United States which both also use the WPUS banner. This template has also continually shown up on the unused templates list.

• delete as no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 15:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, substituting where it has been used as a reference, but delete where it has been used an external link. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISIHighlyCited (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The site this template covers, highlycited.com, is no longer maintained, and all invocations of the template redirect to the site's top page; not to the individual researcher, as designed. The template no longer works, and cannot be updated to work. "As of December 31, 2011, Highly Cited Research will no longer be maintained or updated as a stand-alone resource." I propose a bot remove the transclusions of the template and that it be deleted. TJRC (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. As template author I've been aware of this problem but remiss in doing anything about it, so I thank
  ISI Highly Cited researcher to a link to one of the still-functional category list pages. That leaves 16 transclusions that are being used as references for more substantive information, including a few where this is the only reference for the biography of a living person (e.g. Gheorghe Păun, Duane Ilstrup). It seems unhelpful to delete these as, per WP:Link rot#Keeping dead links, "Such a link indicates that information was (probably) verifiable in the past". It would probably be useful to update the template to mark the links as dead, and update its documentation page, but I'll await the outcome of this discussion. Qwfp (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Thanks, Qwpf. My sampling found uses only as external links, where
  WP:DEADLINK isn't applicable. You raise an excellent point for those instances where they are used as references. For those, I suggest that they be subst'd, so that the reference can be retained despite the link rot, and then the template should be deleted. TJRC (talk) 19:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Speedy delete per
  G8. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.