Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 17

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

December 17

Template:2015–16 Pacific-12 Conference women's basketball standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was merge, feel free to move it to the correct title. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template is a duplicate of the preferred and correct Template:2015–16 Pac-12 Conference women's basketball standings. ("Pac-12" is preferred to "Pacific-12") UW Dawgs (talk) 20:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Convert/flip2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 December 26Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Convert/show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of {{convert}} which is redundant to {{convert|disp=unit}} and {{convert|disp=unit2}}. note this template is not used by (nor was it ever used by) {{convert/old}}. this template was used by other forks like {{convert/text2}} and {{convert/text3}}. but, now that those templates have been deleted, this one can be deleted as well. Frietjes (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:PD-TXGov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete with link in deletion log summary. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not actually a template, and there are no transclusions.

Stefan2 (talk) 12:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

(namely, this discussion on Commons of the copyright status of works of the Texas government (and a couple other states)) Good idea, Frietjes, with "Legality unclear. State works probably not copyrightable absent specific legislation."
Noteworthy: there's no copyright notice at texas.gov. Rather it says "Some information on Texas.gov may be protected by trademark and copyright laws and otherwise protected as intellectual property." [1]--Elvey(tc) 21:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://texas.gov/#policies (Click 'more' under "Linking Policy"
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Wisconsin–Whitewater Warhawks football coach navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep.

(non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 02:36, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 08:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. Functionally identical to numerous equivalent nav boxes as seen in Category:NCAA Division III football coach navigational boxes. UW Dawgs (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then they need to be looked at, but one or two links is not sufficient enough to navigate, which is the whole point of the navbox. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 18:41, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 00:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw nomination – enough links to navigate, now. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 00:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as more articles have now been created. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per EJ's comment above: good-faith article creation has expanded the number of linked articles to navigate since this TfD was opened. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. We now have six linked articles from the navbox. Cbl62 (talk) 02:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Scottish dogs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

The result of the discussion was merge into {{

(non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 07:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Propose merging

Template:English dogs
.
I propose changing the name of
talk) 10:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I have undone the merger until this discussion reaches a consensus (either on the merger or final name).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: {{Irish dogs}} has been kept separate, and this discussion is about the various UK dog breed templates.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Emmerdale family navigational templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

The result of the discussion was relist to Dec 30. Primefac (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per

WP:NENAN. These are redundant to Template:Emmerdale characters. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:42, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The numerous character articles probably need to be merged. Also agree with Frietjes. --Izno (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).