Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:00, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ctlf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Generates:

== References ==
{{unreferenced}}

== See also ==



<!--Categories-->
{{categoryneeded}}

<!--Other languages-->

Not being used.

• Comment: "This template should always be substituted" – how do you know it's not being used? PC78 (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Educated guess, combined with the fact that it contains an interlanguage links section and that it is plainly useless.
    talk) 10:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • That's a cleanup notice, so should be quickly replaced. There's nothing distinctive in the output of this template that can be used as a signature of its use. And people likely add categories and delete other languages, as they go about editing the article this was used on. -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep—this template is substituted so it shouldn't have any transclusions. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 10:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

Not in use Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:03, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• weak delete, Module:Factorization is being used, but this frontend is not in use. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep, per Frietjes (we have the module, and it should be easy to use) Christian75 (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If it hasn't found a use in two years, I think we can safely call it useless. Jimp 13:45, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.