Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 16:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlxplain (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tcplain (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary variants of {{

• delete unused --  Gadget850 ^talk 15:46, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lua module categorization (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused; overly complex method of adding a category --  Gadget850 ^talk 15:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 16:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Padl\r documentation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 23:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused --  Gadget850 ^talk 15:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 16:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pad left (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pad right (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Pad left and right (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (added 16:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC))

redundant to other methods for adding padding (e.g., {{

• Keep they are not redundant, they can produce a variable size of padding, and their naming makes sense. Further, they are of a series with an unnominated template {{pad left and right}} -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • added {{pad left and right}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Redundant to Template:Pad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 08:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete redundant; in examining each template, {{pad}} can easily replace all; the first two are unused, {{Pad left and right}} is used on one help page. --  Gadget850 ^talk 15:50, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as redundant. The left and right one would need to be replaced by two identical transclusions of {{pad}}, but I don't think it's used enough to worry about wrapping or anything. —PC-XT+ 01:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aside (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

non-standard template for inserting endashes in prose. seems less opaque to just use the standard method for adding endashes. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete overly complex method of text formatting --  Gadget850 ^talk 17:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Haysi Fantayzee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Very few topics, no prospect for expansion. Topics are already well-connected (or could be if not already, and don't need the navbox for it).

• Keep
  Jim and the soapdish 16:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

That depends on whether anything else about them is notable. At present, an LP and single are listed, but both could (if they do not already) have a list of personnel involved. Both titles could be put on the pages of each band member. If expanded, fine, but at present this template is not needed and there is no guarantee it will be.

Guy 23:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep,
  WP:NENAN. or, is there another reason to delete it? Frietjes (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:11, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Section references (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

rarely used. Frietjes (talk) 21:07, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete used in four articles; non-standard citation method: I know of no style that uses anything like this; move current uses into the section --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this is a relatively new template. Restrict to non-article-space. This should not be used in articlespace, as all references should be in the main references section. However, this would be useful in discussions, so use in WP-space and talk-space would be good. Document into the reference template system -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why do we need a different citation system for non-articles? --  Gadget850 ^talk 15:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because they are discussions, and references should be associated with the discussion thread, not the page. The references should exist in the thread, not at the bottom of the talk page, where they would not be associated with the various completely different discussions (such as
      WP:VP each thread has nothing to do with each other; or here at TFD, where each discussion has nothing to do with each other) -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 07:35, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
      ]
      • Aha. You are referring to Automatically generated reference lists; the help page shows how to handle--  Gadget850 ^talk 19:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC) that with {{reflist-talk}}.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Paragraph references (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused; oddball referencing method --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:→ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

nearly unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Unused (only used in see also for another template); redundant with → in the CharInsert toolbar below the edit window. --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • You'd need to look up the arrow symbol to even use the template, so it doesn't serve a purpose as shortcut template for the arrow. It does add a non-breaking space in front of the arrow (it appears to be part of
    a series). SiBr₄ (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox country/check capital (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Infobox country/image+caption (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox brewery/beer list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Born–died (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

rarely used and unnecessary. Frietjes (talk) 20:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete one article use; simply adds non-breaking space and n dash --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Completely unnecessary. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:00, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Present (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary variation in font size and styling. Frietjes (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fake tag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed. Frietjes (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete redundant to {{tag}} --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to {{tag}} -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:No visibility (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{0}}. Frietjes (talk) 20:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused and redundant --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment {{0}} is poorly named, it should be called "no visibility" since it isn't restricted to statistics use and wraps an HTML entity. -- 70.51.200.101 (talk) 03:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is an issue for a separate discussion. --  Gadget850 ^talk 15:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 17:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

we already have enough hatnote templates. Frietjes (talk) 20:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 2007 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 2003 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 1994 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 1990 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 1989 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 1969 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:A.C. Milan squad - 1963 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 2014 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 2002 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 2000 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1998 UEFA Champions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1998 UEFA Campions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1998 UEFA Cgampions League Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1966 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1960 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1959 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1958 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1957 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Real Madrid C.F. squad - 1956 European Cup Champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I think that the templates are not really useful, they are just tagged at the end of a players articles without providing new information. If a player won the Champions League/European Cup this can usually be found in the Honours' section. Jaellee (talk) 19:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Uh, am I missing something here? As an American, I can't say that I have an in-depth knowledge of the various European football/soccer championships, but it is a well-established practice among the major sports WikiProjects to create roster navboxes for individual teams that win major championships. Are these not major football/soccer championships? I think we need to notify WikiProject Football regarding this TfD discussion. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Football has been notified [1]. Up to now such templates were only provided for national teams participating in a World Cup or Continental Cup, not for club teams. --Jaellee (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I, for one, will defer to WikiProject Football's more restrictive standards regarding championship team navboxes, if that is the established practice of WP:FOOTY. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 20:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all - in association football/soccer we do not have/need these kind of 'champions' templates like there are in US sports (NBA, MLB, NFL etc.) - I think the reason why they are acceptable in those sports is because (and forgive my ignorance if I am incorrect) but there is only one major trophy to win each season, whereas in football there are many (see often three but sometimes more) so it's simply not practical. GiantSnowman 20:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• That is correct, sir. Only one championship trophy per customer per year/season in MLB, NBA, NFL, NHL and WNBA professional leagues and NCAA college sports. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• As I understand it, it would be unusual for a US sportsperson to win more than three or four championships in their career so these templates don't clutter up their articles too much. In contrast, though, Welsh footballer Ryan Giggs won 34 trophies during his playing career, and to have a championship squad template for every one of those at the bottom of his article would absolutely ludicrous.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per the Snowman's rationale immediately above and the established practices of WP:FOOTY. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all Overkill. Number 57 09:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per all above. –
  Jay 14:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 09:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Col-10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Col-9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Col-8 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Col-7 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (added 15:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC))

unused, redundant to {{col-break}}, and fixed large column counts are bad for narrow screens. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete unused and redundant --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 09:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tlib (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tli (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tnfpad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tpad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tlpadb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tlpad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:TlxU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Tcplainb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

generally unused. Frietjes (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• delete all per nom. --NSH002 (talk) 21:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete these are variants of {{
  tl}} (of which we have a plethora of variants) that just add padding or other useless styling --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC) :PS: {{Tnfpad}} did not get tagged.[reply
  ]
  • fixed. Frietjes (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 09:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TodaysFABar2006 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary frontend (note, did not notify retireduser2). Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• unused --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:34, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:20, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MiddleTennesseeSports (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template should be deleted because it is redundant to Template:Tennessee Sports. All teams listed in this template are also listed in the state template. It's pointless having two templates that accomplish the same task: listing other sports in the area. For an example, see Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles. Tavix |  Talk  14:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator's rationale: redundant to statewide sports navbox. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment regarding notice - @Tavix: Please provide notice of this pending TfD to the template creator. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneTavix |  Talk  15:13, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Tavix. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. One all-inclusive table covering all TN sports teams is more useful for navigation. NatureBoyMD (talk) 02:04, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:00, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Members of the European Parliament 1999–2004 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Members of the European Parliament 2004–2009 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Members of the European Parliament 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:SlovakEPmembers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:South West England MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:United Kingdom MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Wales MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:North East England MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:North West England MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Northern Ireland MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Scotland MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Estonia MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Malta MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Yorkshire and the Humber MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:South East England MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Sweden MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Hungary MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:France MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Germany MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Malta MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Austria MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Belgium MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Bulgaria MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Cyprus MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Czech Republic MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Denmark MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Estonia MEPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Greece MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Finland MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Italy MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Lithuania MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Latvia MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Luxembourg MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Netherlands MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Poland MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Portugal MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Romania MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Slovakia MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Slovenia MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:Spain MEPs 2009–2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Template:France MEPs 2009-2014 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (redirect)

Way too vast to be useful.

• Comment - A large number of links are not an automatic disqualifier for a navbox, if the navbox is coherent, well-organized and satisfies the
  WP:NAVBOX criteria. That being said, this is the largest number of links I have ever seen in a single navbox: almost 800 primary links to articles about MEPs, and over 1,000 when secondary links are included. Given these numbers, I seriously question whether there is a better way to organize and navigate these links -- perhaps by creating "sub" navboxes for each EC member country's list of MEPs for use on the individual MEP article pages. As existing people navboxes expand with newly added links each year based on elections, new hires, new HOF inductions, new recipients of annual awards, new winners of annual competitions, etc., this is going to become an increasingly frequent issue for our navboxes, and it is one that deserves some serious discussion (apart from a simple "too big, delete" answer). Clearly, the parent list article and categories/subcategories also have a role to play here as well. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment regarding notice - @
  Robsinden: Please notify the creator of these templates of this pending TfD discussion. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

User has been blocked for the last 5 years. --

talk) 15:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, Rob, as far as excuses for not notifying a template creator go, that's a relatively good one. I have notified WikiProject European Union of this TfD discussion: [2]. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete these unwieldy navboxes. New ones should be created for each country and kept current, e.g. {{
  talk) 15:16, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I've created one as an example
    talk) 15:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Good suggestion, Alakzi. I think this may be the way to go here, as long as the information in the navboxes for the past EU parliament sessions is preserved in the underlying list articles. Is there anyone else we should be pinging to join this TfD other than WP:European Union? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • talk) 15:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        • Done, Alakzi: [3]. While I think your suggestion is an excellent one, it would be nice if we had some buy-in from the editors who actually create and maintain the MEP articles before we completely change their inter-article navigation systems. And someone is going to need to create all of those newly subdivided navboxes, too, if this is the route we choose to go. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - subject to an important proviso. We have some useful precedents for dealing with large navboxes. The largest that I'm aware of is Template:Murinae, the next largest (in its earlier existence) is/was Template:The Beatles. I recommend taking a look at the edit histories and talk pages of these templates. Templates this huge serve no useful function as navboxes, even though they are written using {{Navbox}}. That does not mean that they cannot serve a useful purpose: they become, not navboxes, but instead should be thought of as list articles, presented in a different form. It follows, if we think of them in this form, that they can (and should) be linked to, but should not be transcluded at all, or transcluded on only one or two articles at most. The course of action is: (1) create new navboxes of conventional size (not difficult to do this, as the monsters are already organised by country); (2) remove all transclusions of the monster templates, and replace by the appropriate smaller template (a straightforward but long and tedious job, given the large number of links); (3) the smaller templates may also be added to articles where there is no transclusion of the monster template (4) replace the monster templates with the appropriate collection of smaller templates (see {{Murinae}} for an example). Worth noting that, in addition to the obvious pointlessness of having such huge navboxes transcluded on individual MEP articles, there is another problem, hidden well below the wiki-waterline: the huge number of inter-article links generated, which increases, not linearly, but with the square of navbox size. Another reason why the use of the monster templates as conventional navboxes has to be rejected. NSH002 (talk) 20:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It follows, if we think of them in this form, that they can (and should) be linked to ... Linked to from where?
    talk) 20:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Wherever appropriate. One obvious place would be the |below= section of the smaller templates. --NSH002 (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Why not link to the list articles, like with my example?
        talk) 20:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
        ]
        • No reason why not, or you could have both, or you could link from the list articles. --NSH002 (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
          • Why do we need lists "of a different form" that duplicate existing list articles? I'm trying to understand.
            talk) 21:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
            ]
            • My memory must be failing! I had thought that when I (mostly) re-wrote the article for the MEP Molly Scott Cato, that I had put in a "See also" list to the full list for 2014-2019, but on checking, I see that I merely linked to the UK list. Which means I must have rejected the need to create even a navbox restricted to UK MEPs - and, by extension, to per-country MEP navboxes. I also see that (thankfully) no-one has tried to create a similar monster navbox for 2014-2019. I note also that the MEP list articles are actually quite good. So I think, in this case, these can all be deleted, and moreover there is little point in creating per-country navboxes either. But the general point I made above remains: "too large" is not always a sufficient reason to delete a navbox (though often it will be). --NSH002 (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete, way too large of a scope to be useful and duplicates the articles,
  Members of the European Parliament 1999–2004. I could see having one for a more narrow range, but even that would be questionable since it would lead to more "bottom of the article bloat". Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete way too large. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:12, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; overlarge and not useful for navigation. Almost certainly listified somewhere already. Neutrality^talk 19:43, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:04, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tiny ping (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

• Keep. I did not notice the talk page discussion or I would have commented and you could have alerted me by using this template. Doing so would have worked perfectly; that is, this template works without any problem for its intended function of providing an echo notification, which is the point. We don't need large intrusion in text with the relatively recently added ping facility. The facility comes from the notification provided, the red number in the interface informing of a message, who it's from, where it is, and a link to the location – which is its chief function, to provide the notification – not for others to read @NAME on the page. The reason for the template's existence is to keep the displayed end to others with as small a footprint as possible, as I do not want any post of mine to be prefixed by a large @User1, User2, and User3:. The users it is intended to alert get the notification and don't need to see their usernames in large relation to text and its use is not intended for readers. This is just the next step up from using a "silent ping", which some have asked for because they want no footprint at all.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • None of which addresses the issue of the accessibility of the text that is displayed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually it does. You just stating "accessibility" as a mantra without analysis is not very meaningful. Everything is contextual, and the context here is that this is not the article mainspace but talk pages, and the text is not meant to be part of the post, but a way to invoke the echo notification system. This text is not meant to be a part of the post to be read. Making it resemble and appear to be part the body of the post – the semantic content of the talk page message you are writing – by its posting at normal size is a distraction, is what it being minimized (but without hiding it entirely); it is a feature not a bug. To the extent your use of “accessibility” refers to issues for vision impaired users, I’m not understanding what you mean. Wouldn’t this have no affect whatsoever on people using JAWS and similar?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fuhghettaboutit, I agree that there may be some use to an 'invisible' ping, but wouldn't putting it in an element with display="none" do the same thing more effectively? {{invisible ping}} might be preferable over {{unreadable ping}} Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • User:Martijn Hoekstra Seconding Martijn's proposal for an "invisible ping" using <span style="display:none;">; I had the same idea. (Testing with this message whether or not it works.) SiBr₄ (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • It works. And suddenly, I'm not so sure it's a good idea anymore. I get a note I'm being pinged, but I don't see a ping. Confusion ensues. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • The wikitext would still include the {{invisible ping}} template, so it is visible in the diff screen (which is what displays if "View changes" is clicked in the Alerts box). It may be confusing if one is used to pings being displayed, but once found, the template name obviously implies the resulting ping would be invisible. SiBr₄ (talk) 11:23, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
          • I understand your arguments, but I just experienced it first hand, and have to conclude that the result is non-intuitive and confusing. For me this is one of these things that sound like a great idea, but just doesn't work as well as I imagined it would in practice. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete If we really need such a feature, add it as an option to {{
  ping}} --  Gadget850 ^talk 21:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. It has the opposite effect to its intention for me. I see a tiny piece of text that is below the threshold of what I can read and I strain to try to read it. It actually draws my attention to it far more than {{
  ping}} to have the display hidden. There are some good ideas at http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/hiding-content-for-accessibility --RexxS (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. I have to agree with
  CC}} should satisfy Fuhghettaboutit's concern about accessibility, but also would blend into the surrounding text better than the triple <small>. Timothy G. ^{from CA} (talk) 06:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak delete in favor of other suggestions such as an undisplayed ping —PC-XT+ 01:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC) (...if any alternatives are needed.) —PC-XT+ 14:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Fuhghettaboutit says, above "We don't need large intrusion in text with the relatively recently added ping facility" (emphasis in original). The nominated template is used on 629 pages. {{
  Ping}} is used on 89,582 - over 140 times as many. It's clear that the members of our community have "voted with their feet" on this matter; and there seems to be no problem for the "tiny" template, nor the mooted invisible replacement, to solve. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:22, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivy League business school navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ivy League law school navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Ivy League medical school navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Delete all per previous TfD discussion and deletion of similar navboxes @

"1. All articles within a template relate to a single, coherent subject.

"2. The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article.

"3. The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent.

"4. There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template.

"5. You would want to list many of these articles in the See also sections of the articles."

In my opinion, all of these navboxes fail criteria nos. 2, 3 and 5 -- and these criteria suggest that these are not appropriate navbox topics. Please note that there are related pending TfDs @ Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 1#Template:Atlantic Coast Conference student newspaper navbox and @ Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 1#Template:Atlantic Coast Conference business school navbox. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete, athletics association is orthogonal to academics. Frietjes (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete In addition to the arguments put forth by Dirtlawyer1, the burden of proof is on those who argue that these navboxes align well with how others' classify these subjects or how they classify themselves e.g., active organizations that mirror these navboxes. In the absence of such evidence, the assumption that these subjects are not classified or organized according to the athletic conference of their respective institutions is a natural one that requires rebuttal. I would not be surprised if such evidence can be provided in a few instances where some subjects have created such organizations; however, we still require evidence. That said, it is more a bit disingenuous to claim that the Ivy League is simply an athletic conference without significant cultural and historical associations that extend well beyond the narrow world of U.S. higher education minutiae. ElKevbo (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with the arguments of DL and ElKevbo --rogerd (talk) 22:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete academic departments have nothing to do with athletic conferences (which is what the Ivy League is)--GrapedApe (talk) 01:36, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'm not going to vote on this, because I really don't care one way or the other. But, I do feel it's worth pointing out, that, at least in the US, the phrase "Ivy League" has a meaning outside of just athletics. In fact, I think you could make a pretty good case, that, to the average American, the academic meaning of the phrase "Ivy League" is actually the primary one (obviously, we college sports nuts are not the average). That's fairly unique, in fact, I can't think of any other US college athletic conference that's in even a remotely similar situation. So, this is a bit of a unique case, IMHO. Ejgreen77 (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above; irrelevant. Neutrality^talk 18:20, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 March 22. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Sri Lankan Parliament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages

)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Montenegrin Municipalities with a significant Albanian population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant, there is already an Category:Albanian communities in Montenegro. No other ethnic minority in former Yugoslavia uses this type of template, and because of NPOV, it should not be used. Extensive population data should be housed at Albanians in Montenegro. Zoupan 02:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment regarding notice - @Zoupan: Please provide notice of this pending TfD discussion to the template creator. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Zoupan 15:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks, Zoupan. Your cooperation is appreciated. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Sandžak (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Sandžak is not a country, nor an administrative unit. It has no official use. Zoupan 02:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment regarding notice - @Zoupan: Please provide notice of this pending TfD discussion to the template creator. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Zoupan 15:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks, Zoupan! Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• If it doesn't fulfil the conditions delete it. --
  Talk! 15:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC) I have removed the indent from Ammartivari's comment to clarify it was not in response to the preceding discussion of notifying the template creator. If anyone disagrees, including Ammartivari, please feel free to revert.Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]