Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 April 28
April 28
Template:Shipley
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izkala (talk) 00:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Shipley (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused; no blue links. ~ RobTalk 21:34, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:Scottish civil parish
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ]
Unused, created in 2006. Not sure what this was meant to be. ~ RobTalk 21:32, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- It is a lookup table of codes to parish names and populations. Owain (talk) 07:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:HabPlanetScore
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was No consensus. The template was previously nominated here and got no consensus. It looks like one editor has been pushing this template for deletion, and has gotten mixed results. This discussion has been idle for about 3 weeks now, with no further comments in sight. Reintroduction of transclusions should continue in a discussion on the template's talk page. ]
- Template:HabPlanetScore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Since last nomination, it has been removed from all pages on Wikipedia and it does not appear to me likely to be used again. jps (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- @I9Q79oL78KiL0QTFHgyc: Removed by whom and as a result of what discussion? ~ RobTalk 15:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Strong keep, since it was removed by the nominator fromdgaf) 15:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)]Delete,Keep as a deprecated templateperdgaf) 18:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)]
- But I mean the reasons keep adding up. Talk 23:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)]
- This template was not used on that page. Please try to keep up. jps (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Striking some comments here since I mistook another template for this one. ~ RobTalk 17:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, it was used in this article, until dgaf) 17:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)]
- What does a removal that was done before the last TfD have to do with this situation? You are muddying the waters and generally behaving like a ]
- Keep as a deprecated template, this template was widely used in past revisions of astronomy articles, and deleting it could render old versions of articles unreadable. Talk 21:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)]
- Also note that this template was not that "Page Specific", It was prevosly used in many Exoplanet articles such as Gliese 667 Cc, Kepler-452b, Kepler-442b, Kepler-438b and probably even more articles used this template in the past. Talk 23:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)]
- Also note that this template was not that "Page Specific", It was prevosly used in many Exoplanet articles such as Gliese 667 Cc, Kepler-452b, Kepler-442b, Kepler-438b and probably even more articles used this template in the past.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Template:UnicodeTitle
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Izkala (talk) 00:27, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Template:UnicodeTitle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Now unused. Non-functional now that {{Unicode}} has been deleted. ~ RobTalk 12:46, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Is this a candidate for ]
- @]
- Deprecate; Wikipedia:Database reports/Templates transcluded on the most pages shows that the template was used on 13,000 pages in 2013, and deletion would mess up those pages' history. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 11:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- How would they be messed up? The template may leak in old revisions, but that is not uncommon for deleted templates. It should not be a consideration in a deletion discussion.
-- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}}
15:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)- @Jc86035: All this template does is display the title of the page in Unicode (which is nonfunctional now). Deleting this template will leave a red template link somewhere on the page in the history, but zero article content will be unreadable. It just adds something that is unsightly in a very, very minor way. ~ RobTalk 15:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- How would they be messed up? The template may leak in old revisions, but that is not uncommon for deleted templates. It should not be a consideration in a deletion discussion.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).