Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 7

< June 6	June 8 >

June 7

Template:Infobox Unbinilium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Unbinilium (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded infobox for single element. Not needed Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notes: 1. Not to be confused with lowercase

WT:ELEMENTS. -DePiep (talk) 11:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete for being wrong name sp. Unused. No redirect needed. -DePiep (talk) 11:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DePiep. Double sharp (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also for erroneous periodic table. How can unquadunium (141) be above unbinilium (120), I mean unbiunium (121) which you're claiming is another name for the real name of unbinilium? And how can you claim element 173 is not named yet when you claim that unquadunium has a name? And what do you mean it's in period 11? It's in period 8! Someone did a very bad job in theoretical science class. 8.40.151.110 (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Infobox Fußballspieler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep. The template is substitute only, so the rationale makes little sense. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
)

Unused non-english template Ten Pound Hammer • ⁽What did I screw up now?) 22:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, TenPoundHammer, I certainly hope it's unused per the instructions in the template, it's used for translating articles imported from the German Wikipedia, and must be substituted for it to work. Frietjes (talk) 22:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Makes translations a lot easier. Look at the documentation: it's meant to be subst'd. --NSH001 (talk) 07:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Inclusivity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was soft delete.

WP:REFUND applies. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Inclusivity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Hurricane disambiguation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hurricane disambiguation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused disambiguation template; was inexplicably tagged historical in last TFD despite no historical value. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete or redirect. Frietjes (talk) 00:36, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Humor2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Humor2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused variant of {{humor}} Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Hope and Crosby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hope and Crosby (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused actor-by-performance template Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Joey B singles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joey B singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Two links are now redirects and artist's article is at AFD. Fails EXISTING and insufficient for navigation. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 19:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as KGirlTrucker81 points out it fails EXISTING. Even if the artist's article survives AfD, none of his work actually will pass
WP:GNG at this time. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Dated

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Keep. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dated (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Totally redundant to

subst:cn}} gives the same result as {{subst:dated|cn}} and is shorter. Ppp ery 02:16, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

@Pppery: Does every dated maintenance template have Module:Unsubst? Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I know, plus it is fairly trivial to add it to one. Ppp ery 13:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I created this template to deal with a need which existed at the time; I have no oposition to delete this once it's verified that all dated maintenance templates:

Are set up as stated above;
Their documentation has been updated accordingly

עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The first part of that task has been done and will be done for new templates by a bot. Ppp ery 00:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per DRV outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Even when the "Module:Unsubst" would make dating easier, it applies to just probably mainspace maintenance tags. I tried {{
subst:archive me}}, used for talk pages, but it doesn't automatically date. Attempts to modify the module would require more time to add more coding to make this temples less necessary. Also, this template may not be as redundant or useless as claimed to be, even when the template creator may have no objections to deletion. It's also a good alternative to those not wanting to rely on bots automatically dating the tags. Even it can be useful, especially when a bot malfunctions. --George Ho (talk) 17:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

AnomieBOT is one of the least-likely-to-malfunction bots around, and I'll grant for the sake of argument that this template is redundant to unsubst - but so what? {{
Cryptic 19:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. Useful. KMF (talk) 02:23, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ITSUSEFUL is an argument to avoid. Ppp ery 02:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
For articles. Which you would know if you read that instead of just throwing the pithy shortcut around. Templates aren't content; their only purpose is to be useful in making or maintaining content. —
Cryptic 02:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep as per Cryptic, and because there is no reason to force those who are used to this to change pattern. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 11:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Happy Tree Friends episodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Happy Tree Friends episodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, everything on the template is a redirect anyway Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Redundant to {{
talk) 15:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Governor box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Governor box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant to {{succession box}} Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Gambling terminology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gambling terminology (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and incomplete Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:26, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:G10 delayed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as

G7 by Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:G10 delayed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Said " it isn't rightly coded so don't currently use it." in 2011 and nothing has changed since then. Clearly unused, and seems to be supporting something that we don't do. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fullyprotected

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 14. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fullyprotected (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fox South Dakota

Template:Firefox warning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Firefox warning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is from 2007 and never used. I am pretty sure both Firefox and our templates in general have changed radically since then. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Film Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as

G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Film Theory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and incomplete Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I never came around to finishing it – as don't have the time to finish it (and neither won't have in the future), you can go ahead and delete it. Tony Mach (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Featured topic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Featured topic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, other templates now exist to indicate featured topics. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't remember why I made this template. I'm fine with it being deleted if there's no use of it. GamerPro64 17:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fact10

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fact10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Clearly not needed. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:FPR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FPR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:FPR-instructions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:FPR_bottom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:FPR_top (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused now that Wikipedia:Featured portals is defunct. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:14, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused / general housekeeping, but without prejudice to undeletion if (and it's a big if) the featured portals project ever restarts.
Bencherlite^Talk 14:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Latin Grammy Award hosts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 14. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latin Grammy Award hosts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:End of season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:End of season (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Overly specific and unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused? Good stuff - I assume this has either been superseded or obviated by advances since it was written in 2009. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Empire of Vietnam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. It appears it was merged with the article with this edit. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Empire of Vietnam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded infobox, not needed since real infoboxes can do the same thing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Elizabeth May series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Elizabeth May series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, would fail

WP:NENAN if used Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:15, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

What Hammer said... Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Durham college

The result of the discussion was delete.

WP:T3 (Unused, redundant template). ed g2s • talk 16:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Durham college (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

College-specific infobox, not needed since we have a unified infobox now. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Dragonlancetasks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dragonlancetasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

To-do page for wikiproject that no longer exists and was merged. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Discuss links here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 14. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Discuss links here (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Cutf-old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cutf-old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Blank, unclear use Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Current Kiribati Cabinet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 14. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current Kiribati Cabinet (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CloseRat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. See this search for historical uses (only 25, and almost exclusively in 2011) Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CloseRat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Use of tabulation of vote numbers seems to go against

WP:CON, and I overall see no need to split hairs over deletion closing like this. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Citizendium copy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete.

WP:G7 (author requested). Primefac (talk) 11:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Template:Citizendium copy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Citizendium}} and unused Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Carson City, Nevada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carson City, Nevada (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused draft from 2013, only content is a redlink. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Boston meetup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Boston meetup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Invitation template for event that happened 6 years ago. No foreseeable use. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Berenstain Spelling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Berenstain Spelling (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-article warning, was apparently never used. If this is a problem, then just use a generic warning box. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Created during a discussion at Talk:Berenstain Bears#Suggesting protection. The problem seems to have been settled with a section on name confusion in the artlcle and protection of the article. StarryGrandma (talk) 19:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Beetle tasks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Beetle tasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and blank task list from 2012. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:BaseballGA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BaseballGA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused GA template, we now have better and more uniform ones. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Baseball Quick Facts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Baseball Quick Facts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template from 2007. No need for this now that infoboxes exist. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It is a relic of an old age. Things were different when I created it. With the focus on prose that took place years back, such quick fact sections have become passe. There is now only one team page that still features one, and the Padres removed the template in favor of custom text so that they could change the available fields. No longer necessary. --The Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 08:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Barrymore family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Barrymore family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant to Barrymore family Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:BBREF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 14. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BBREF (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Administrator review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Administrator review (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused: wikipedia:Administrator review is inactive Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There was no consensus to mark ADREV as historical, just one editor doing so not even two months ago. Removing the template without consensus to retire the process itself seems a bit hasty. Regards So Why 06:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: There have been <10 admin reviews since 2015, none of which got more than a single response. I think it's pretty clear the project is dead. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:58, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that it has been slow there, however I believe the fate of the template should be coupled to the fate of the process. I have proposed reviving ADREV at VPPR. If there is consensus against it, I'll happily G7 the template. Regards So Why 12:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, nothing gained from deletion. N.B. My attention was directed here by SoWhy (Special:Diff/784458583). –xeno^talk 15:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Admin talk page banner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Admin talk page banner (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; there are better templates that say the same thing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Adam Matthew topicon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adam Matthew topicon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Adds a microscopic logo to the upper right. No foreseeable use. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:AIAssessment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 14. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AIAssessment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).