Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 19

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< April 18 April 20 >

April 19

Template:Wikipedia ads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep

talk) 06:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Why do you have to convince people to do things via ads, it violates

WP:SOCKSTRIKE 03:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Dream Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination on behalf of

MfD
with the rationale:

With all the names being set to merge or redirect it makes this template redundant.

--kelapstick(bainuu) 20:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in
talk) 03:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Keep − 8 of the names do not redirect. Bogger (talk) 09:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All the pages on the template currently redirect, except the list of characters page which has been nominated for deletion. The closure of the AfDs ended with a merge recommendation, so now all the pages redirect to the main article. I just redirected them (not merge, as I didn't see any content worth merging as it was all in-universe writing), but the history is still there if someone wanted to take any content and merge it across (but I don't see much value in that). --kelapstick(bainuu) 14:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Hayatabad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 15:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no navigable links. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete A navbox without links serves no purpose....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, provides no navigation. Frietjes (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fb cl MLS team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:23, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old style, no need. same usage of

talk) 13:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in
talk) 14:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk) 05:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Sorry, C&P error/not paying enough attention! GiantSnowman 06:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Mass Fb cl templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete all but the H&A template which has no consensus. Please feel free to renominate that one if you would still like to see it deleted. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old style, no need. Same usage of

talk) 13:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in
talk) 14:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 18:50, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Template:Fb cl header H&A as it's used, see 2007–08 Football Conference. The first table on this Football Conference page was completely messed up by adding the 'page for deletion' box to the template page, so I've taken the liberty of removing the 'page for deletion' notice from this template's page in the hope that the Football Conference page reverts to its previously healthy state when the caching of the template page is next done (Is that how it works?) There are also lots and lots of other places this template would be very useful in tidying up that type of league table, but I've never got round to doing it... Mmitchell10 (talk) 20:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@
talk) 02:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
I would say, though, to please make sure to noinclude the deletion tag or select the don't show option in twinkle; as that is causing breakage Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:04, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for sorting out the display on the Football Conference page Mmitchell10 (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Agree with Mmitchell10. --Fayçal.09 (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all after replacing Unnecessary, the module should be used instead. S.A. Julio (talk) 21:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment from nominator As discussions above, I would like to keep about H&A, and still delete others.
    talk) 11:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Fb cl header H&A should be deleted as well, this type of table should be discussed at
WT:FOOTY first, as the standard table does not separate home and and away results. Either way, this could be deleted after merging into Module:Sports table if necessary. S.A. Julio (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Agree with you. But we need consensus first. Maybe we need a better solution about H&A templates in
talk) 08:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fb a team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging

Template:Fb a2 team
.
same usage, but without relying on Fb team templates
talk) 12:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in
talk) 14:10, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
@
talk) 02:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
What do the templates even do? GiantSnowman 06:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! I know what you say. Thank you.
talk) 07:37, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Iron Chef Gauntlet 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:DabprimaryExpand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:29, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:SIA-Conversion-Expand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 15:30, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Set-index articles are very rare, and disambigs are almost never converted to set-indexes. Therefore, this template is a solution looking for a problem. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 02:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It is a maintenance-type / cleanup-type tag, used for a while in the past to mark disambiguation pages that should probably be converted to SIA pages. It was/can be useful for disambiguation-focused editors racing through the monthly disambiguation challenge to mark dabs for further thought. Sure, SIA pages are relatively rare, so what? It would be fine for a cleanup category to be entirely empty, we still keep such things. --Doncram (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, currently suggested are:
It is a decent suggestion for each of those, that the topics should be converted to Set Index Articles. --Doncram (talk) 02:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:30, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – I would agree with
    WP:BROKE, because there are articles where this template can be usefully applied, even if not many. That can easily change, though, say if someone decides to go through a whole bunch of disambiguation pages in their WikiProject and finds that several can be converted into SIAs. We don't delete templates that have a theoretical application just because they currently don't apply anywhere.--Newbiepedian (talk · C · X! · L) 20:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Patronymic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 April 28. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:30, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:NovelsWikiProject Collaboration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was archive. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Really old template. Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 02:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - There are so many really old templates that should also go then - in fact why not delete them all! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 08:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Haifaa al-Mansour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly unlinked articles; not enough linked article per

TW 10:36, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Jassper Flexx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as

G8 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

This is a navigational template that consists of three redlinks, two redlinks that were deleted last year and the third was never made into an article. Aspects (talk) 04:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Incomplete

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Let the

(non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Propose merging

Template:Incomplete with Template:Missing information
.
These are essentially the same template with slightly-different wording: how is "this article is incomplete: the reason is X" different from "this article is missing information about X"? Lojbanist remove cattle from stage 00:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_19&oldid=875138367"