Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 3

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< August 2 August 4 >

August 3

Template:Boldmono

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 14. Primefac (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Youtuber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as

G11 by Dlohcierekim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

vanity page in template space. noq (talk) 11:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Not a template - Just an editor mistaking the templatespace for articlespace, Doesn't link anywhere, Obvious delete. –Davey2010Talk 12:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete under
    WP:G11. — Newslinger talk 13:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Deleted per G11 as a misplaced promo page by a new user, just as I saw the MFD template.- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Strong support

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. I hesitate to do a G4 deletion when the previous discussions were so long ago, but the present discussion is clearly heading towards delete, suggesting a

talk) 14:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

See: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/Deleted/June_2005#Template:Support_and_Template:Object_and_Template:Oppose, Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/Deleted/November_2005#Template:Vote_and_all_derivatives, Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_3#Voting_templates_yet_again, Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_May_4#Template:!comment, Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_June_5#AfD_voting_templates, Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_October_30#Template:Oppose_Symbol_and_Template:Support_Symbol, Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_July_17#Template:Support, Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_April_6#Template:Support. Consensus has been repeatedly against these templates staying on WP. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 02:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - Consensus changes and FWIW the project was hell of a lot different in 2007/2008 and even 2012, The template has its uses so no harm keeping. –Davey2010Talk 02:54, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I didn't take into account the XFD process, I thought more along the lines of RFA, It's useful but not for XFD so delete. –Davey2010Talk 15:46, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_August_3&oldid=854828531"