Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 April 29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
  )
• talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
  )

Edit warring is too serious to warrant "softening" the issue. If these templates are not deleted and {{uw-ew}} is merged into {{uw-3rr}}, these templates should be merged as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Anyone got usage statistics on the templates? I created the first one but I'm not really attached to it; if it's being used it's no harm to keep it. Stifle (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The search engine counts at least 522 uses of uw-ewsoft and 45 uses of uw-3rr-alt. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:09, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I wouldn't say the message ought to be soft or hard, but I think I single template can accomplish a balanced delivery. --Bsherr (talk) 20:24, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: Twinkle's maintainers were not notified of this discussion, I have done so now. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

• Module:HTMLDecode (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Module:String (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 7. Primefac (talk) 01:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
  )
• talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
  )

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

• Template:Checkuser takeover (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unneeded reblock message. In cases where checkusers override normal blocks with checkuser blocks, simply using the existing {{checkuserblock-account}} or {{CheckUser block}} templates suffices. Mz7 (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Never used – let's get rid of it.
   ■ 12:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

• Module:CoronaTable (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 April 4#Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/Automatically updated cases * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Pppery (IDK how to pronounce this). --Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

• Template:2014–15 Azerbaijan Premier League table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2015–16 Azerbaijan Premier League table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These has been merged into the main/seasonal articles. HawkAussie (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 17:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).