Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 9

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< December 8 December 10 >

December 9

Template:Jellemdejong/Template:Dutch steam locomotives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was move to user page. Izno (talk) 00:19, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Duplicate of {{Navigation Dutch steam locomotives}}, which is used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Democracy Index ranking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CPAPinline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:Alfa Pendular which is used and has the same route. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CNSV Incubate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as this particular part of the Conservatism WikiProject is no longer active and the template has no chance of being used again at this point in time. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CMTA lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Largest metropolitan areas of Brazil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

duplicates {{Largest urban agglomerations in Brazil}} and not needed in List of metropolitan areas in Brazil which already has a much more detailed table Frietjes (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CITWF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 00:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and not needed as there already are specific CITWF templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • This follows the pattern of Template:IMDb. This actually should not be used on mainspace, because if you see it that means that's an error, and it needs to be fixed. That's my understanding. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    But they're eight IMDB templates where CITWF has two. CITWF name and title are not often used but are still used on several articles. I'm not sure there is much confusion in editors trying to use one of the CITWF templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a poorly-structured template disambiguation page that was only nominated for deletion because it lacked the proper template indicating that fact. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Hamid Naderi Yeganeh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox contains only redirect links that lead to the main topic. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Sibagat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:25, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox contains only redirect links to Sibagat. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Atheist and other moved userboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These userbox-shaped soft redirects in template space have no transclusions and no incoming links. Their migration is therefore complete, and they can be deleted. We thank them for their service. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Infobox Conspiracy theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This template is only six months old, but as it was the author's last edit it probably is abandoned permanently. User:GKFXtalk 20:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Letran Knights 2019-2020 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox roster template with only redlinks for player names. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom/
WP:NENAN. User:GKFXtalk 20:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Notice icon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. A simple file link. If needed, this icon could probably be built into {{Icon}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 20:07, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to {{icon}} , which should have notice, comment, query, remark, etc, that also have several of their own templates.-- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Nwhbt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:28, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Appear to duplicate {{Hbw}} and {{Hb}}, although it is difficult to be sure because there is no usage. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Looks like Nwhbt is (approximately) a duplicate of Hbw and Nhbt is just [[{{{1}}} men's national handball team|{{{1}}}]]. User:GKFXtalk 20:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Undilute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:29, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a template, just text. No transclusions, no incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/G2 Template says "This is a test template" - G2 likely applies. User:GKFXtalk 20:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as a test page per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete experimental template that was never constructed. There is no code there, only the documentation, which isn't even noincluded. -- 65.92.246.43 (talk) 03:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Three-revert rule

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice to recreation as the suggested redirect. Izno (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. No documentation indicating why this template exists and how to use it. {{

WP:3RR. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 20:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template:Uw-3rr. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Userbox-2/WhateverYourNewBoxNameIs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:31, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Apparent experiment. Created 11 months ago and not modified by its creator since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 20:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Despite the name, this is not actually a userbox, so TfD is the correct venue. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Bronze18

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These two templates were created in June 2021 for use with {{Golf18}}, but they have no transclusions. The editor who created them and added them to the template's documentation appears to have stopped editing in August 2021. They can always be recreated if they are needed later. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete unused templates that are not needed (the golf template is a dodgy template anyway, as it fails
    MOS:ACCESS, so adding more crap to it will just make it worse). Joseph2302 (talk) 15:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2020–21 Ivy League men's basketball standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This template will not be used, since the 2020–21 Ivy League basketball season was cancelled.[1] – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 20:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Ivy League cancels basketball season for 2020-21 as part of ban on winter sports due to COVID-19". CBSSports.com. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
Delete as season was cancelled, will never be used. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:AFC Cup 2007 and related templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:33, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These templates appear to have been replaced in relevant articles by the more comprehensive templates in Category:Asian association football navigational boxes by year. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Very few articles exist for the tournament itself with links only to the teams that played in the AFC Cup stages and finals. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not needed, we don't want templates listing every team in a tournament. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. GiantSnowman 13:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CDU/CSU chairmen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 17. Izno (talk) 00:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CBB Yearly Record Subhead alt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:34, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:CBB yearly record subhead. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CA religion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart for religion statistics. Already better handled by charts and tables on religion articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CANinttop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused highway templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Fencing at the 2019 Summer Universiade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:35, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with nothing but red links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:C-nl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused IPA working templates. Either they were abandoned or were test pages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For Template:C2-mh, archive if possible, but otherwise retire. It has since been replaced by the Lua-based Template:IPAc2-mh. - Gilgamesh (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all The entire concept of "archivng" a template makes no sense, as the purpose of templates is to be used, not viewed. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:28, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But if a template is based on another, isn't keeping the latter required by GFDL/CC-BY-SA? (In principle that is. I don't know if the history of {{C2-mh}} provides license-required attribution for {{IPAc2-mh}}.) Nardog (talk) 14:39, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is sufficient attribution (to wit, the primary author is Gilgamesh in both cases). Izno (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:City of Cape Town government

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with only three links to articles. Rest are redirects. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:S-line/Adelaide right/Tonsley and 35 other unused S-line templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused S-line templates with over six months since the most recent edit. Nominating for deletion per this discussion; articles using S-line templates are being migrated to use Template:Adjacent stations. Also see the most recent related TFD, from October 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2010–11 football in Portugal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; created at the wrong name. See {{2010–11 in Portuguese football}} and Category:Years in Portuguese football navigational boxes to observe that these two are outliers. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Miss Peru winners in the Big Four pageants and similar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN. Just [one, two, or] three relevant links. The Banner talk 09:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Canaan Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After redirection of non-notable singles and EPs, this now links only three pages and fails

WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:44, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Ref RFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:27, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Early Brahmic scripts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 16. ✗plicit 13:28, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Brahmi scripts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart with the scripts already featured on the main article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Baseball secondary color

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:37, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused color template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:CIP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:39, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused flag template for the International Paralympic Committee despite the reverse acronym. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_9&oldid=1060836358"