Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 26

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

May 26

Template:Scotland-railway-routemap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and obsolete. Function replaced by {{UK-railway-routemap|cat=Scotland}}. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's ).

Template:Elements.css

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template displays a link to elements.css. Elements.css was replaced by elements.less in March. This template is only used in a handful of places anyway, and it's now obsolete. Where it is used now, it could be easily replaced with {{MediaWiki source|mediawiki.skinning/elements.less}}A L T E R C A R I   14:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Qonja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Transcluded only in

Lets Celebrate, not even the artist here has an article. Including a number of related articles doesn't make this necessary. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).