Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 May 31

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ethical frameworks sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Template:Ethics, only used on 8 pages, all of which also have the other template, so no merge is needed Psychastes (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Zero Contradictions (talk) 19:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Ludwig Wittgenstein. ✗plicit 14:35, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wittgenstein (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages
  )
• Template:Ludwig Wittgenstein (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging

• Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per nom. Zero Contradictions (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Remain calm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created to be a more-intelligible version of {{calm}}, which is being deleted. This version still contributes to banner blindness and I would be shocked if it ever made someone more civil, so I think it should be deleted. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:25, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom Psychastes (talk) 23:09, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I feel like especially in a template about
  primacy bias
  . I don't see this template making anyone more civil.

Legend of 14 (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Just a
  WP:REDUNDANTFORK, and given that the original is now being deleted, this one should, too, for the same reasons. NLeeuw (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per nom. Zero Contradictions (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 June 14. Izno (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Manbalar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 June 21. Primefac (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Strip_italics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 June 14. Izno (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cit_news (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:C_news (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was keep one, delete the other. Izno (talk) 18:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Campaignbox Sully's Expedition Against the Sioux in Dakota Territory (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Campaignbox Operations Against the Sioux in North Dakota (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Campaignbox Sully's Expedition Against the Sioux in Dakota Territory with Template:Campaignbox Operations Against the Sioux in North Dakota.
I propose to redirect Sully campaignbox to the Operations campaignbox per

The Sully campaignbox includes only 2 battles (set in North Dakota 1864), which are (since 2024) also included in the 6 battles in the Operations campaignbox (the other 4 are set in North Dakota 1863), which is actually used in all linked articles. The Sully campaignbox is only transcluded in Trans-Mississippi theater of the American Civil War, where the Operations campaignbox is also used already, making the Sully campaignbox completely redundant.

Note: the Sully campaignbox was nominated for deletion before in 2012. Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 30#Template:Campaignbox Sully's Expedition Against the Sioux in Dakota Territory. It was kept at the time. But I think adding the 2 Sully battles to the Operations campaignbox in 2024 was a good move, and that there is a good reason now to merge the whole Sully campaignbox into it (effectively just redirecting the Sully campaignbox to the Operations campaignbox). NLeeuw (talk) 11:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Campaignbox Sully's Expedition Against the Sioux in Dakota Territory. Both links are featured in the latter campaignbox and used on both articles. There is nothing to merge and add from another template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair enough. I am used to preferring merge rather than delete at

  WP:CFD, because a log will state which page has merged into which other page. With deletion, that information gets lost. Therefore admins prefer merging. NLeeuw (talk) 18:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's

talk page or in a deletion review

).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:VoR (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template has been around since 2024, and seems to be useless. Legend of 14 (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links to explain why it exists. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Perhaps you could work it out. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 09:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  

• Keep Turns out it had been subst-ed away. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  The conclusion that this template is only substituted is not supported by its documentation. Legend of 14 (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  

That's not what I said. I said it had been substituted, which is why there were no uses. It's a fairly classic case of those who wish to destroy doing it piecemeal. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 07:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Only used on one article. Delete and cite reference outside template space. If more uses are found, then we can keep. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Are you volunteering to watch for more uses and restore the template when needed? All the best: Rich Farmbrough 07:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this section.