Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia:unreferenced blp rescue include js speeches
The page "Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- skin I'm using when putting JS code in, like Special:MyPage/vector.js or Special:MyPage/monobook.js. When did common.js make such practices obsolete...491 KB (62,737 words) - 16:59, 19 February 2024
- magic I can put in my Vector.js. I'm a cautious editor and like to preview my edit summaries, especially if I'm trying to include wikilinks. -- John of Reading...503 KB (65,583 words) - 17:02, 16 April 2023
- article project. Thank goodness, because it's not very well done. It's speech synthesis that sounds like a robot in an old B-rated sci-fi movie. Unintentionally...505 KB (66,666 words) - 22:02, 15 February 2023
- specifically at Next.js, the book, Next.js Quick Start Guide: Server-side rendering done right (2018), The Next.js Handbook, as well as Next.js 9.5 Improves Static...7 KB (42,393 words) - 17:24, 29 October 2020
- willing to bring them up to BLP standards doesn't formalise the out of process deletions, but it does give editors a way to rescue some of these articles that...607 KB (76,972 words) - 01:31, 5 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253 (section Recommendations on BLP policy from Asaram)early on he was removing unreferenced accusations made by a few registered and nonregistered editors...this is in keeping with BLP[21]. Reliable sources...730 KB (101,274 words) - 09:10, 19 February 2024
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 110 (section BLP is the relevant policy for personal attacks?)the more I dislike BLPPROD. With the importance we place on BLPs, we give unreferenced ones more time than a usual PROD? But I agree, that's a separate...440 KB (64,691 words) - 10:13, 7 August 2023
- speech about public figures on Wikipedia. 5.12.68.204 (talk) 05:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Another RfC/U participant thought eventually that it was a BLP violation...694 KB (65,328 words) - 09:34, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1043 (section Geo Swan and BLP related to Derek Chauvin)particular) due to it being an unreferenced change to a BLP article. I gave them a level 1 notice for an unreferenced BLP addition. They shortly after posted...847 KB (108,647 words) - 20:58, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive833 (section Insisting to include large direct quotes)been any BLP violations! Administrators are able to revdel unambiguous BLP violations, but also, if you include diffs, they can still see any BLP violations...724 KB (100,840 words) - 01:40, 5 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive348 (section Orphaned .js and .css pages in User space)trolling and all that included, plays out at AfD. No consensus on BLPs defaults to “not include” for a good reason. Volunteer Marek 14:30, 13 December 2022...682 KB (79,610 words) - 18:00, 8 May 2024
- It was for repeatedly creating unreferenced/unclearly referenced articles (including blps) and refusing to communicate. It was closed because...797 KB (108,996 words) - 22:02, 4 February 2023
- whether to include specific details regarding the subject's medical history. Perhaps someone here could eyeball it to make sure all is BLP-compliant with...204 KB (28,981 words) - 19:47, 27 April 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive806 (section BLP talk page being used for defamation)the Colbert Report, so we include a link to the primary source for reference. Everything is cited, balanced and accurate, so BLP is not involved. Since you...718 KB (99,707 words) - 13:32, 19 May 2024
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive889 (section User:PeterTheFourth editwarring to retain BLP violations in talk page)WP:Randy in Boise moment. Now expanded, in true WP fashion, to include a dozen people. Official BLP topic ban apparently rescinded; unofficial "do not do that...777 KB (102,098 words) - 00:45, 22 August 2023
- to include? If the (BLP-grade) reliable sources don't include any less-than-rosy information, then it'd be a violation of NPOV and BLP to include any...274 KB (38,062 words) - 08:25, 3 October 2021
- closure/monobook.js indicating he doesn't understand regexps - yes, I'm familiar with John's programming because I used his User:John254/mass rollback.js after seeing...603 KB (83,561 words) - 10:52, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive777 (section Apparent violation of WP:BLP and other policies by Zbrnajsem)purpose account that has been adding unreferenced information to article Chris Nathaniel in violation of WP:BLP. This has been treated as vandalism, though...928 KB (126,097 words) - 13:48, 21 April 2023
- neglecting fact that it was already suggested that inserting unreferenced material [88] is vio of BLP) However this damaging info repeatedly restored by Radeksz...416 KB (51,495 words) - 10:58, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive325 (section Request to delete User:Gioguch/sandbox/ccs.js)approach seems more WP:NOTFORUM and WP:RGW than not and likely also includes some WP:BLP violations. I thought of going in and trying to sort things out myself...700 KB (97,336 words) - 10:36, 21 February 2022
- Risto's attempt at NPOV was disliked. But this was a BLP article that contained BLP violations, and BLP policy in theory should protect users who attempt