Wikipedia:Update/1/Content policy changes, July 2010 to December 2010

4th quarter 2010

Wikipedia:Article titles
- In
  WP:TITLE#Deciding on an article title
  , changed: "As part of this, a good title should convey what English, in an encyclopedic register, actually calls the subject (this does not mean Wikipedia must follow other encyclopedias' titles)." to: "As part of this, a good title should convey what the subject is actually called in English."
- In
  WP:TITLE#Common names
  , added: "Other encyclopedias may be helpful in deciding what titles are in an encyclopedic register, as well as what name is most common (see below)."
- In
  WP:RNEUTRAL
  ."
- In
  WP:TITLE#Precision and disambiguation
  , added: "Often there is no alternative to parenthetical disambiguation, and it does have the advantage that the non-parenthesized part of the title may most clearly convey what the subject is called in English. On the other hand, such disambiguations may be longer or less natural than an alternate but unambiguous form, when there is one."
- In
  WP:ITALICS
  ."
- In
  WP:TITLE#Italics and other formatting, added: "In addition, certain templates, including Template:Infobox book, Template:Infobox film, and Template:Infobox album
  , will by default italicize the titles of the pages they appear on; see the pages for those templates for details."

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
- In
  WP:BLP#Legal persons and groups
  , removed: "Bear in mind that when dealing with groups, particularly very small ones, edits made to Wikipedia could have a bearing on living persons, so exercise caution."

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Substantial changes throughout since September

Wikipedia:No original research
- In the introduction, removed: ["original research" ... refers to any analysis or synthesis] "by Wikipedians" [of published material ...]. Added: "Despite the need to attribute content to reliable sources, you must not plagiarize them. Articles should be written in your own words while substantially retaining the meaning of the source material."
- In
  WP:BLPPRIMARY
  , which is policy." Added: "Whether material counts as a primary or secondary source is not fixed. A book by a military historian about the Second World War might be a secondary source of material about the war, but if it includes details of the author's own war experiences, it would be a primary source of material about those issues."
- In
  WP:NOR#Citing oneself
  , added: "In fact, expert input is encouraged and experts often have specific knowledge of the relevant literature."

Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Substantial changes throughout since September

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- In
  WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files, added: "... (see Plagiarism guideline: Public-domain sources
  for guidelines on" [adding content from public domain resources].

September 2010

Wikipedia:Article titles
- In
  WP:TITLE#Deciding an article title
  , added: [Naturalness ...] "As part of this, a good title should convey what English, in an encyclopedic register, actually calls the subject (this does not mean Wikipedia must follow other encyclopedias' titles)." Added: [Consistency ...] "and ideally indicate titles that are in accordance with the principal criteria above."
- In
  Ganga
  ."
- In
  WP:TITLE#Special characters, removed: "Do not apply formatting: Formatting, such as italics or bolding, is technically achievable in page titles but is used only in special cases, one example of which is taxonomic names of genera and species. (See italics and formatting restrictions
  .)"
- In
  Original research. For this reason," [avoid use of "and" in ways that appear biased. For example, use Islamic terrorism
  , not "Islam and terrorism".] "Also avoid the use of "and" to combine concepts that are not commonly combined in reliable sources."

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
- Removed section:
  WP:BLP#Misuse of primary sources
  .
- In
  WP:BLP#Using the subject as a self-published source
  , changed: "These provisions apply less forcibly to autobiographies published by reliable third-party publishing houses (which are NOT "self-published"), but might still be borne in mind (especially point 2)." to: "These provisions do not apply to autobiographies published by reliable third-party publishing houses, because they are not self-published."
- In
  low profile individuals
  ."
- In
  WP:BLP#Where BLP does and does not apply
  , added: [BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including] "talk pages, edit summaries," [user pages, images, and categories.]

Wikipedia:No original research
- In
  WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, removed part of a footnote: "Duke University, Libraries
  offers this definition: "A primary source is a first-hand account of an event. Primary sources may include newspaper articles, letters, diaries, interviews, laws, reports of government commissions, and many other types of documents."

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- In
  WP:NFF
  )"

August 2010

Wikipedia:Article titles
- In
  WP:TITLE#Deciding an article title, there were significant changes from the July
  version.

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
- In
  WP:BLP#Tone
  , changed: [BLPs should be written responsibly,] "conservatively" to: "cautiously"
- In
  WP:BLP#Attack pages
  , changed: [Pages that are unsourced and negative in tone, and] "which appear to have been created to disparage the subject," [should be deleted at once if there is no policy-compliant version to revert to; ...] to: "which may disparage the subject,"
- New subsection:
  WP:BLP#Do not cite to court documents and other public records
- In
  WP:BLP#Using the subject as a self-published source
  , changed: "These provisions do not apply to autobiographies published by reliable third-party publishing houses, because they are not self-published." to: "These provisions apply less forcibly to autobiographies published by reliable third-party publishing houses (which are NOT "self-published"), but might still be borne in mind (especially point 2)."
- In
  WP:BLP#Subjects notable only for one event, added: [Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view
  . In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article,] "or, when the event is itself non-notable, delete the biography."
- In
  WP:BLP#Templates, added: "The template {{BLP removal
  }} can be used on a talk page of an article (or a user) to explain why material has been removed under this policy, and under what conditions the material may be replaced."

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- In
  talk page of the article you are working on, or ask at Wikipedia:Reference desk
  ."

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- In
  WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion, changed: "Articles" [about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style
  .] to: "All information"

July 2010

Wikipedia:Article titles
- In
  WP:TITLE#Deciding an article title
  , changed: "Consistent – Using names and terms that follow the same pattern as those of other similar articles." to: "Consistent – When other criteria do not indicate an obvious choice, consider giving similar articles similar titles."

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
- WP:BLP#Further reading and external links
- In
  WP:BLP#Privacy of names, added: "An event such as marriage, divorce, legal separation, or when the intention to marry, divorce, legally separate is verifiable by its publication in reliable secondary sources, the name of the subject's intended spouse, spouse, or ex-spouse is not private, unless there has been a court seal on the disclosure of the name." [sic
  ]

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- In
  WP:NPOV#Due and undue weight
  , changed: [Neutrality requires that] "an article ..." to: "each article or other page in the mainspace ..."
- In
  WP:NPOV#Common objections and clarifications
  , removed "racism" from [What about views that are morally offensive to most readers, such as sexism and Holocaust denial ...]

Wikipedia:No original research
- In
  WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources
  , changed: "A primary source may only be used to make descriptive statements that can be verified by any educated person without specialist knowledge." to: "A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements that any educated person, with access to the source but without specialist knowledge, will be able to verify are supported by the source."

Wikipedia:Verifiability
- In
  WP:V#Questionable sources
  , removed: [... contentious claims about third parties,] "which includes claims against persons living or dead, institutions, as well as more ill-defined entities."
- In
  WP:V#Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves
  , removed: [third parties] "(such as people, organizations, or entities);"
- In
  WP:V#Reliable sources noticeboard and IRS guideline
  , added: [To discuss the reliability of a specific source] "for a particular statement ..."

Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- In
  WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not censored
  , added: "most" [changes made are displayed immediately]