Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/To do" on Wikipedia
- Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Test Version)likely to get far with it. Wikipedia:Merchandise for other Wikipedia-related products Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team Wikipedia:Version 0.5, the...7 KB (1,082 words) - 08:20, 7 February 2024the Version 1.0 Editorial Team may close the nomination after discussion has died down, either passing it (by moving the set and its contents to Wikipedia:Version...3 KB (2,383 words) - 04:27, 28 July 2007this per WP:IAR. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pinehouse Photography Club articles by quality statistics. (non-admin...3 KB (181 words) - 20:14, 8 May 2020to this page. The result of the debate was speedy delete. —Random832 22:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC) Redundant to Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/U...2 KB (181 words) - 10:49, 22 March 2022Shortcut WP:CORE The Core Topics subproject of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team is intended to identify and work toward improvement of the most important...28 KB (513 words) - 13:58, 12 November 2024Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Turtle articles by quality statistics (Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Turtle articles by quality statistics)...5 KB (527 words) - 23:03, 20 May 2012
- Category:Editorial are being moved to Category:Magazine editorials, will a bot do the move, like at Commons? Previously we had Category:Editorial and Category:Editorials
- a blatant violation of their editorial policy. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Maybe UD does have editorial policies (take a look at this
)