The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed debate of the Arkansas Collaboration of the Month. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or here). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article is currently A-class, and being the Arkansan to reach the highest political office, would be a great candidate to work on. Hopefully the article could achieve FA-status. Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 00:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voting and comments

Support as nominator. Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 00:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Little Rock, Arkansas needs more references, and could use a bit of cleanup. Basketball110 15:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voting and comments

• Support
  Little Rock as nom. Basketball110 15:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Mike Huckabee's article has serious POV problems which are slanted both for and against him. He was governor of Arkansas and a presidential candidate, as you probably know. DiligentTerrier ^{and friends} 20:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voting and comments

• Support Mike Huckabee as nom. DiligentTerrier ^{and friends} 20:20, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - A great suggestion! And definitely needs to be improved. --Chetblong^{T C} 23:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per the above. Jonneroo (talk) 03:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final Result

There Must be at Least 5 Support Votes on an Article For It to be Chosen as The Collaboration of the Month

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or here). No further edits should be made to this page.