April 18

• Golden Elegance Agency (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ahmed Samih (Artist) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Golden Elegance Agency (talk) 13:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked and draft deleted due to

WP:NOTPROMO. S0091 (talk) 14:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Veramerks (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The One Minutes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

I am requesting help because I want to write an article on The One Minutes, a foundation for video art. I submitted a draft but it was denied because there is a similar page called Oneminutes. The One Minutes as a foundation distributes one-minute videos, which are called Oneminutes. The article Oneminutes is quite old and is about the videos used; not about the foundation itself. How can I make sure I can post a new page about the foundation, without it getting denied because it;s similar to the Oneminutes page?

Veramerks (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

Oneminutes

article and this new draft need to do a better job in making it clear to the reader what the taxonomy of all these oneminutes is, because from the little I've looked into these I'm none the wiser.

Also probably worth saying that the Oneminutes article is unreferenced (how it has survived for 16+ years, I've no idea!) and generally a bit of a mess and in need of updating and improving. If you're volunteering to do all that, then have at it! (Just one thing: do you have some sort of external relationship with any of this? If so, I'll post a message on your talk page with instructions on how to manage that.) Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• talk · contribs
  )
  • Draft:NS 1065 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, i am wondering how i can make my Wikipedia article more information. Thanks

@

WP:RSSE. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• MelanieHinkle (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ravi Cabot-Conyers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have received notice that This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. I used the Wikipedia Help Live Chat to get feedback on my article, and tips for citations and sources. With that guidance, I have re-edited and simplified the language, and updated all sources. I took out a lot of unusable sources and would appreciate the opportunity to have this up for reconsideration. Thank you for your time!

MelanieHinkle (talk) 18:03, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:GNG notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Lisapaulinet (talk · contribs)
  • talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

Also, I am unsure of how to fix my references. I took out any reference to the Abbot Public Library's website because my article was declined because the references were not independant of the subject. I hope these references are better. Thanks. Lisapaulinet (talk) 18:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lisapaulinet: don't worry about the redirect, that will be deleted if/when your draft is accepted. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks Lisapaulinet (talk) 11:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Xlea Nollmav (talk · contribs)
  • talk | history | links | watch | logs
    )

I have been working on getting this page approved and having a lot of trouble. The last editor to decline the draft said it may not even be worthy of a Wikipedia page. I have included many secondary, independent, reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, journals, etc.) and have seen other existing pages that have far less than that (one, White's Boots, that even links to the company's own website). I assume that because I disclosed that this is a COI, the page is being placed under more scrutiny. I understand the need for such scrutiny; however, I have to say, the backend of Wikipedia is not easy to navigate/understand, and I am truly trying my best to create an encyclopedic, informative article that abides by all of Wikipedia's rules. I am totally happy to have another Wikipedia editor edit the article and resubmit it for me; however, I am having trouble understanding how to go about requesting that. Any help/direction would be greatly appreciated! Xlea Nollmav (talk) 19:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

WP:OSE. Wikipedia's guidelines have changed overtime, generally becoming more strict, so an article acceptable years ago may not be acceptable today. I have started a discussion on the draft's talk page about notability and pinged you there. S0091 (talk) 20:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I appreciate your note — and help! Xlea Nollmav (talk) 16:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Stickyorangecookie11 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mickey and Bunny (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I found a source on the site Newspapers.com and an article from the Star Phoenix in Saskatoon Saskatchewan as a reference. Stickyorangecookie11 (talk) 21:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

this guide) and expand the draft based what those sources have written then you can come back here and ask to resubmit the draft for another review. S0091 (talk) 21:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]