April 24

• Elina Lovtsova (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Linebet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good afternoon, please tell us in more detail what the reason for the refusal was, were links to independent sources such as The Mail & Guardian provided, or were not enough sources provided? Elina Lovtsova (talk) 07:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who is us? User accounts are strictly for single person use. You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked. Theroadislong (talk) 07:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the definition of a notable company. That your company has a "brand ambassador" is not significant coverage- that is a routine business activity. You have no sources with significant coverage of your company, they just serve to document its existence and activities. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

• Marco Novecento33 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Albugnano DOC (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have prepared the draft, but it is not approved because there are not enough reliable sources, but I mentioned the only one I can provide (the official page of The Italian ministry), as it was done for the Italian wiki page on the same wine. What should I do to have my draft approved? Marco Novecento33 (talk) 11:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Novecento33 The Italian Wikipedia is a different and separate project from the English Wikipedia; each version has its own editors and policies. What is acceptable there is not necessarily acceptable here. If there are no more sources available, this topic would not merit an article here at this time. If it is considered to be acceptable on the Italian Wikipedia, I suggest that you focus your efforts there; there is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not the premier Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Insomnik (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SceptersReboot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

i want this to be public Insomnik (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Insomnik: okay, well, it won't be, because it has been rejected and will therefore not be considered any further. Sorry. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Xa45b (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Reliance Global Corporate Security (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

How can I write this article in a neutral way. And help me in sentence improvement Xa45b (talk) 17:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any alternative ? Xa45b (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xa45b: have you previously edited under different accounts, such as Nittin Das? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no sir, I do not any alternate account Xa45b (talk) 17:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you work for this company? 331dot (talk) 17:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am a college student. I am just interested in private military company like sadat and blackwater. I just interested in military related topic. Xa45b (talk) 17:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; writing a new article is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia. I would suggest that you gain some more experience by editing existing articles before attempting to write a new one. You may also want to use the

new user tutorial as well. 331dot (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm not so willing to extend good faith after looking into this. Draft has been tagged G4 (XfD:

redirect to be XCP'd since he's already hijacked it once and will likely be autoconfirmed in a couple days' time barring administrator intervention. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 18:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

• Rosanna321 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Formation of the IRGC and the first liberation movement (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Need to know why it was declined specifically, how is it not posted as a Wikipedia article? Rosanna321 (talk) 20:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's written in the style of an essay giving the views of the writer, not as a neutral encyclopedia article summarizing what independent

reliable sources say about the topic. I'd suggest that you edit the article about the IGRC if it has any missing information. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@Rosanna321: This draft falls into a contentious topic (post-1978 Iranian politics), as would any edits about the IGRC. Be extremely careful. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 07:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]