Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-03-05/Arbitration report

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Arbitration report

The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The Arbitration Committee opened one case this week, and closed two cases.

Closed cases

  • Nadirali, Szhaider and others, over whether certain people (as article subjects) should be categorised as Indian or Pakistani, and what should occur as a result of this. As a result of the case, Nadirali, Szchaider, Unre4L and Siddiqui
    were each banned for one year.

New case

  • Falun Gong: A case regarding the conduct of various editors on the Falun Gong article. Olaf Stephanos and Asdfg12345 allege that Samuel Luo has edit-warred in removing pro-Falun Gong material from the article, while Luo, Tomananda and others allege that Stephanos, Asdfg and others have edit-warred (including page blanking) in removing anti-Falun Gong material.

Evidence phase

  • Dmcdevit
    , regarding a dispute between Armenian and Azerbaijani editors on a large number of articles.

Voting phase

  • WP:NOR
    violations. Remedies admonishing the parties for their behaviour, and strongly encouraging them to enter into mediation have the support of five arbitrators.
  • WP:COI
    because he is one of Prechter's employees. Fred Bauder has proposed a remedy banning Smallbones from editing articles and talk pages relating to Prechter. It has the support of two arbitrators.

Motion to close

  • Philwelch: A case regarding the actions of Philwelch. A number of editors, principally Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington allege that he has taken "very controversial" sysop actions. Philwelch has since been voluntarily desysopped. Flcelloguy has proposed a principle, which would be carried were the case closed, stating that admins who request desysopping under non-controversial circumstances may have adminship restored upon request, although remedies would be enacted defining Philwelch's desysopping as controversial, and requiring him to reapply through RfA.

Under review

  • Waldorf education: In pursuance of a remedy passed in the initial case, Fred Bauder has initiated a review of all parties' behaviour, and has proposed a remedy banning Pete K from the article and those relating to it indefinitely, which has been supported by Matthew Brown.