Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-03-23/In the news
Wikipedia in the news
Possible alternatives to Wikipedia?
The
Internet Watch Foundation staff threatened
In the wake of the bungled attempt by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) to censor an offensive image on Wikipedia (see earlier story), Computer Shopper reports that IWF staff have received threatening emails and have removed photographs of staff from their website.
English Heritage uses Wikipedia, faces criticism
Will Henley of Building Design reports that English Heritage, the non-governmental public body in the United Kingdom responsible for designating buildings and other sites as "English Heritage sites", has used material from Wikipedia in some of its submissions to the government. In its submission to the government for the site 24-26 Hereford Square, English Heritage included Wikipedia as a source for biographical information on the architect, Colin St John Wilson. After criticism of the use of Wikipedia, English Heritage responded that "it might occasionally be useful for checking dates of architects, like Colin St John Wilson, who are so recent and not yet in the key published sources. We didn’t see any reason to remove or hide it, and sent it over as a complete record of how we dealt with the case."
Wikipedia among most trusted sites in Japan
- Editor's note: this item is based on a second-hand source rather than the original report in Japanese.
According to an English-language summary (may contain explicit images) on the anime, manga, and games website Sankaku Complex, a survey by Yahoo found that Wikipedia is the third most trusted information source in Japan, behind newspapers and radio but ahead of television. (CNET story (in Japanese))
Briefly
- Among others, The Wall Street Journal reviews the new book The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World's Greatest Encyclopedia. Reviews by Wikipedians for the Signpost are coming soon.
- Columnist Rod Dreher states that User:Rod Dreher, who instigated a recent deletion discussion for the Dreher article, is not Dreher himself.
Discuss this story