Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-03-29/News and notes

Usability rollout, downtime, admin phishing, Wikimania scholarships and more

Last week it was announced that the "Vector" skin (example), which has been developed as part of the Usability Initiative and has been in beta test since last August, will replace "Monobook" as the default skin on Wikimedia projects. Deployment will start on Wikimedia Commons on 5 April, and continue on the English Wikipedia in late April. The changes include an improved editing toolbar, relocation of the search box to the top right corner, a simplified layout and a new version of the Wikipedia logo which is "correcting small mistakes and representing new languages" (see e.g. meta:Wikipedia/Logo and earlier Signpost coverage of such issues). More information was provided on the Techblog, in a Q&A and in a discussion on Wikitech-l.

The announcement was covered by

The deployment roughly coincides with the usability project's original conclusion date as projected when it was initiated in January 2009, funded by an $800,000 grant by the Stanton Foundation (see Signpost coverage). Following the success of the last fundraiser and a $2 million grant from Google, the project was recently made permanent as "user experience" (UX) (see Signpost coverage). Other usability improvements such as the template editor or the "outline" (a table of contents allowing easier navigation while editing long articles) are still being tested and will be deployed at a later date.

Server overheating and DNS problems cause global Wikipedia downtime

On Wednesday, 24 March 2010,

The story was covered by a number of media outlets.^[1][2][3] Bigtimepeace put together a list of related tweets.

Wikipedia administrator accounts targeted

Administrators on the English Wikipedia received a letter this weekend from "Wikipedia Freedom Fighters" asking them to give up their admin account details for the purposes of "utilis[ing] your account to help rid Wikipedia of the corruption and bureaucracy at every level that continues to plague it to this very day." Slightly different versions of the message were sent to inactive and active administrators. The messages were sent through the special:emailuser function, from a variety of throwaway accounts. The messages seem to have been sent to every administrator on the site, including current staff and Board members who are also administrators.

There was brief discussion, including posts containing the text of the letter, on the wikien-l and Foundation-l mailing lists.

Wikimania Scholarships open

The call for applications for Wikimania Scholarships to attend Wikimania 2010 in Gdansk, Poland (July 9-11) is now open. The Wikimedia Foundation offers Scholarships to pay for selected individuals' round trip travel, accommodations, and registration at the conference.

To apply, complete and submit the application form. For additional information, please visit the Scholarships information and FAQ pages.

Wikimedia Polska report

Wikimedia Polska (Wikimedia Poland) had their annual general assembly meeting this past weekend in Warsaw. The two-day event featured talks and a general business meeting, including a report on the status of the chapter and discussion about the chapter's future. Lectures included topics such as "Learning in Wikipedia and Wikipedia in learning," "Wikipedia and Marketing – Opportunities and Threats," and "Conversion of Wikipedia pages on DAISY Audio Format for the Visually Impaired and Blind." The English-language version of the program can be found [1].

Elections of chapter officials were also held. The new board is:

• Tomasz Ganicz (Polimerek) – President
• Marek Stelmasik (Masti) – Vicepresident
• Piotr Czerniawski (Szwedzki) – Vicepresident
• Agnieszka Kwiecień (Nova) – Secretary
• Paweł Drozd (Drozdp) – Treasurer

The conference attracted around 100 attendees and was held in the

Briefly

• Soxred93's Edit Counter, a tool analyzing a user's contributions which had been linked since last October on the wiki's contributions page, has been made partially opt-in after privacy concerns were raised about the monthly activity graphs it was displaying. The Toolserver rules allow edit counters, but restrict the kind of temporal behavior analysis done without a user's consent. Some years ago, the daily/weekly graphs of Interiot's edit counter were made opt-in due to legal concerns.
• The deadline for Wikimania 2011 bids to submit their complete information was 30 March; the current bids include Toronto, Canada; Montréal, Canada; Haifa, Israel, and New York City, USA. The Wikimedia jury will now spend four weeks analyzing and determining the suitability of the bids, including meeting with the bidders; all community members are welcome to comment on and ask questions of the bids on their bid talk pages, which are linked to from here.
• Hostnames starting with a "www.", such as "www.en.wikipedia.org" or "www.commons.wikimedia.org" are now redirecting to the corresponding project site (Bug 1698).
• The privacy warning that anonymous users see after clicking the edit button (MediaWiki:Anoneditwarning, advising them that their IP address will be stored in the edit history after clicking "Save page"), currently vanishes after they click "Show preview". In the future, the preview window will also display such a message, configurable at MediaWiki:Anonpreviewwarning. (Bug 21520, added in version r64367. When it will be enabled on Wikipedia is unknown.)
• On his blog, Guillaume Paumier from the Multimedia Usability project examined the ratio of the number of files to the number of active or very active participants on Wikimedia Commons. Paumier found that both numbers have risen sharply in recent years (in contrast to the ratio of articles per participant on the English Wikipedia), and observes that "MediaWiki does not provide dedicated features to help the limited community of participants absorb the inflow of new media files".

This week in history

• 2005: MediaWiki 1.4 released, preparations move forward for version 1.5
• 2009: Community weighs license update

← Previous "News and notes"

Next "News and notes" →

In this issue

29 March 2010

News and notes

In the news

Sister projects

WikiProject report

Features and admins

Arbitration report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

Will monobook still be an option after the switch over, or am I going to have to relearn where everything is all over again like I do every time Microsoft updates its software? I like the default version and I am really not looking forward to the change, but I see no indication that the old version (or should I say the current version since the switchover hasn't happened yet) will remain an option for the editors. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article said that Vector will become the default skin - not that it will become the only skin.

According to the announcement, Monobook will still be available: "Logged-in users will have the option to return to the classic functionality using a one-click process."

Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say it's about time for a change...not that I really like Vector anyway. I'd still be using Monobook. bibliomaniac15 23:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you log in and go to "my preferences" and then "appearances", there are many skins to choose from, including the old "classic" which was pre-monobook. So I expect they'll keep monobook around :) You can also preview the vector skin by selecting it. It's not a major change -- the search box moves, etc. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 04:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How much have the various gadgets and scripts been tested with Vector? If the ones I use don't work, then I'll be sticking to Monbook -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the gadgets have been tested and most of the popular scripts have already been converted months ago. If you have a tool that is not yet working, report it on

WP:VP/T and someone will probably take care of it. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

• Jay Leno also joked about Wikipedia overheating in one of his monologues. Needless to say, noone was laughing at his lame jokes. [2] -- œ^™ 23:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• "For a while there, people had nowhere to go for phony, inaccurate information." Really Jay, that was the best you could do? How about: "The server was allegedly located in Amsterdam, which is the capital of Italy"?

• From the message these "freedom fighters" sent out... "We are currently expanding our portfolio of administrator accounts and perhaps you could consider sharing yours with us - to do so will take you only two minutes: change the password (if desired) and then reply to this email with your login details. We'll do the rest!" This... worries me considerably. They already have access to some admin accounts? ALI ^{nom nom} 16:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe. Some believe that due to the large number of people contacted (there are about 1400 people with Admin rights on en.wikipedia) it is inevitable that at least a few fell for this. Others (including me) believe that everyone who gained Admin rights are the type of person who would not send their password to a stranger. In any case, this wording is typical salespeak -- make it sound as if others have taken the bait, so the mark is comforted by numbers -- so it isn't definite proof of anything. -- llywrch (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, that was apparently in one of the original emails. I don't know. Who would be crazy enough to do something like this? What are they trying to do? ...Eh, it probably doesn't matter. ALI ^{nom nom} 17:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Special:Statistics, there are ~1700 accounts with administrator access. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's because I'm a new admin, and so not jaded and cynical (!) but I've not heard from the freedom fighters... -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are at least a few admins who did not receive these messages; I don't think there's any systematic way to know how many of the admins got them. There appear to be many who did and a few who did not, with no special pattern. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 00:13, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I never got these messages, however I do know that they were sent out previously. Not everyone has email on, of course. Rich Farmbrough, 19:30, 4 April 2010 (UTC).[reply]