Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-06-27/In the news

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The Signpost
← Back to Contents
View Latest Issue


In the news

Russian president uploads to Wikimedia Commons; brief news

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Jan eissfeldt , Tilman Bayer and Lumos3

Russian president uploads image to Commons, as part of RIA Novosti donation

One of the donated images, Defenders of Leningrad'. Great Patriotic War soldiers in attack (1943)

Beginning

Great Patriotic War
. In a RIAN video Medvedev is shown uploading to "Vikisklad" (Wikimedia Commons, literally "Wiki warehouse") from around the 18-minute mark.

As explained by Sj on the Wikilove.in blog, specific images from the archives can be requested on a project page on the Russian Wikipedia, and "roughly 800 of the most popular or requested images will be uploaded by the end of the year". See also Wikinews: "n:RIA Novosti celebrates 70th anniversary, uploads 100 images to Wikimedia Commons"

Medvedev had shown support for free licenses and copyright reform on various other occasions recently, see Signpost coverage: "Russian president pushes for Creative Commons licencing", "Russian president meets with Internet community representatives, including Wikimedia", "Wales praises Russian president".

In brief

  • German New Right press attacks Wikipedia: The Junge Freiheit, the leading German New Right weekly newspaper, covered Wikipedia as a main topic this week, claiming that the community censors content and runs a Nineteen Eighty-Four-like project. The comment by the editor-in-chief can be read here.
  • Wiknics: Wikipedians and Wikimedians met in 18 cities around the country to celebrate the first US-wide wiki-meetup-a-thon. (Washington Post)
  • "When in doubt, rely on Wikipedia": Swedish health expert Hans Rosling was recently interviewed about social media and "teaching in the digital age". As "special skills" that are important for students today, he named "Critical thinking, reasoning and a quest for sources of all information. And when in doubt, rely on Wikipedia. It is amazingly good, especially if you carefully read the history of the text of interest." The interviewer, a lecturer at the Bundeswehr University Munich, added: "To throw Wikipedia out of our classrooms because of its flaws ignores the much deeper lessons we could be teaching our students about managing massive amounts of information and developing meaningful, up-to-date analytical skills in the digital age."
  • Longest articles and best photos: Last week,
    Buzzfeed featured "The 100 longest entries on Wikipedia", displaying around 78,000 views at the time of writing, and the "Wiki(media Commons) Pictures Of The Year" (see 2010 results page on Commons
    ).
  • Jimmy Wales in Israeli presidential conference: As reported (with video) by the Jerusalem Post, Jimmy Wales spoke about the "consumer-driven media revolution" at "Facing Tomorrow" Presidential Conference in Jerusalem last week. About Wikipedia, he said that "Everything in Wikipedia, everything in the Wiki-world really, is a social innovation, not a technical innovation".
  • Jimmy Wales about bribes and wedding dresses: In an recent audio interview with
    Wedding dress of Kate Middleton
    as an example for content that is under-represented due to Wikipedia's gender gap.
  • Wikipedia as model for natural linking: Search engine optimization blog SEOMOZ analyzed a large number of links pointing to Wikipedia, presenting some of their statistical characteristics as "The Wikipedia Model" of a natural link structure - deviations from which would indicate artificial (paid) links.
  • US Judge orders ISP to release names of anonymous Wikipedia posters: A federal magistrate judge in Denver has ordered the real identity of anonymous Wikipedia editors be revealed. French fashion retailer Façonnable had cited them in a defamation lawsuit (see earlier Signpost coverage: Company sues IP editors for defamation", "US ISP has to release identity of anonymous editors in libel case"). The ruling could have broad implications for online privacy and free speech. Reported in The Denver Post and The Republic.
← Previous "In the news"
Next "In the news" →
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
  • Wikipedia:1984 Bulwersator (talk) 07:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is serious problem, even mentioned in this article "Inzwischen verlassen sich, wie Kenner bestätigen, Mitarbeiter von Ministerien, des Bundespresseamtes, von Presseabteilungen großer Konzerne, ja auch die meisten Journalisten fast blindlings auf die Einträge bei Wikipedia." - google translate Bulwersator (talk) 07:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ohne Zweifel, wahr; aber what people don't realize (or admit to themselves) is that that phenomenon is inevitable anyway. All that can be done is to try to keep it in check to a reasonable extent. Call out the embarrassing breaches for social censure, but don't expect the breaches to stop occurring. Forgive me if I'm preaching to the choir. I'm shooting from the hip in this comments namespace. — ¾-10 00:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps we have a gender gap in part because people think an article about a wedding dress is a typically "female" topic. Powers T 15:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you know? It's the stock
PHB solution to reach the female market, "And we'll have a model in pink for the ladies." -- llywrch (talk) 04:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
The fact that the dress article was subject to a deletion debate with much discussion including by Jimbo himself should be noted. Rmhermen (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My favourite part about this story is that shortly after Jimbo called for 100 articles about famous dresses, the Category:Individual dresses was created, and now we're quickly approaching the 100 article mark, largely thanks to User:Dr. Blofeld! :D Mlm42 (talk) 18:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scary. The question is, is User:Dr. Blofeld female? =) Powers T 01:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One thing I love about WP. Point out a flaw, and someone just may take some big steps to mitigate it as soon as you do. It's cool because it kind of takes the wind out of the sails of WP haters. Not saying that anyone involved in this particular instance was a WP hater (don't know without spending time to check). But the same principle is at work. — ¾-10 18:01, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The Signpost is written by editors like you — join in!
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2011-06-27/In_the_news&oldid=1193867438"