Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2017-11-24/Arbitration report

Arbitration report

Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely

Administrator desysopped

Following

WP:ADMINACCT

". Specific incidents included removing permissions from a user during an ANI discussion – which reversed another admin's administrative action without prior notification or discussion – and failing to provide evidence for claims made against another user.

Current requests

Crosswiki issues request:
Fram, other involved party Ymblanter
– motion for discussion closed 22 November probably looking at an RfC about "whether and how information from Wikidata should be used on English Wikipedia"

Mister Wiki case: Request opened 21 November 2017 by TonyBallioni; other involved parties Salvidrim! and Soetermans – vote reached 6/0/0 on 23 November and very likely to result in a case

Declined requests

Zoyetu request: Request opened 16 October 2017 by
topic banned
on 7 November
Joefromrandb request: Request opened 20 October 2017 by TomStar81 – declined <3/7/2>
Conduct at Reference Desks request: Request opened 30 October 2017 by Robert McClenon – declined <0/9/0>
List of unofficial users of Iranian rial request: Request opened 31 October 2017 by John N Smith – unanimously declined
Nathan B. Forrest request: Request opened 6 November 2017 by Azarbarzin – declined <0/8/0>
List of European islands by population – Island of Ireland countries editing dispute: Request opened 9 November 2017 by PompeyTheGreat – declined <0/7/0>

In brief

Elections: 2017 elections kicked off with Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017. There are eight vacant seats with two-year terms. Self-nominations are closed; voting will commence Monday 00:00, 27 November until Sunday 23:59, 10 December, UTC.

← Previous "Arbitration report"

Next "Arbitration report" →

In this issue

24 November 2017 (all comments)

News and notes

Arbitration report

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

What does "opener tban blocked 7 November" mean? Typo or internal enwiki jargon? Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jargon. I'm pretty sure the fully-expanded is "The user who submitted the arbitration request was blocked for violating a topic ban on 7 November" (which may have been unrelated). --Izno (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As this is a multinational project, I would really appreciate if people refrained from usign slang, jargon, unnecesary abreviations, etc. Why? Well, I could have expressed my last sentence in something like: A vel si sus dejáis de rajar en una froma to chunga de fablar, que no sus entiendi un piho, odo. I bet that you have found the last sentence I at least a bit hard to understand, even if you know Spanish. Well, the same can happen with the English language. So, please, keep it simple if it can be. B25es (talk) 15:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've
been bold and replaced the problematical word. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]
I made the report and apologize for the brevity. We were under quite a bit of time pressure especially with the US holiday in the background. It was also my first arbitration report writeup for Signpost. Which is a good time to plug joining the staff if you are interested in matters of writing. We can always use more hands. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost needs your help putting together the next issue.

Home

About