Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-03-29/Discussion report
Appearance
Discussion report
Rethinking draft space
Draft space: success or failure?
The
general notability guideline
).
new page patrollers (who are already severely backlogged), and keeps poorly written content and content from editors with a conflict of interest
out of mainspace, where they would be visible to more readers.
In brief
- On SOPA); others saw the geonotice as in line with the Wikimedia movement's goals. There were also complaints that this controversial geonotice had not been put up for discussion in a more frequently visited page like the village pump (in fact, the author of this column didn't even know the geonotice request board existed until he wrote this paragraph).
- On WP:RSNexplaining the requirements for a source to be deprecated or blacklisted.
- On the section of the Manual of Style on the capitalization of job titles(such as President of the United States) has been controversial for a long time and led to many edit wars. Opponents of MOS:JOBTITLES argue that it is confusing and does not have the support of the community, while supporters point towards its consistency with the style guides of reputable English-language sources.
Discuss this story