Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia talk:Administrative action review/include/assets/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Administrative action review/include/assets/js/language-change.js" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- filters and sitewide JS/CSS affect the whole site, but I do see the difference. (edit filters affect only the editors, whereas sitewide JS/CSS affects all...78 KB (10,359 words) - 06:34, 5 November 2021
- Gracenotes/changesSince.js 16 Gracenotes/g 16 Gracenotes/vandinfo.js 15 Gracenotes/Wdefcon 10 Gracenotes/PUI.js 10 Gracenotes/wpPicmark.js 9 Gracenotes/Quotes...176 KB (27,062 words) - 17:50, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Progress (section Changes to this page)title=User:Dudemanfellabra/NRHPmap.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); // try NRHP map maker to your commons.js file. Then, in Microsoft Edge, purge...110 KB (15,265 words) - 04:51, 5 April 2023
- bugging me for some reason: In the "MassRollback.js" finding one sentence reads "expected to review the target account's contributions and be sure that...101 KB (14,076 words) - 17:52, 10 February 2019
- use two administrative terms for the same locality, for example, but there is absolutely no reason not to include the political, administrative and geographical...200 KB (29,178 words) - 22:46, 2 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Archive 2 (section Cannot review drafts)automatic removal from that process. WP:ADMINACCT is specifically about administrative actions, but the principle applies wiki-wide. This is particularly true...103 KB (14,047 words) - 18:19, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 31 (section Creating a list for AfC participants that can speak languages other than English.)subject of some administrative restrictions, you are free to introduce new articles directly into Main space without submitting them for review. NewYorkActuary...263 KB (37,099 words) - 18:36, 18 October 2023
- When certain recent OTRS administrative actions on Wikipedia have been mentioned by the media, they labeled them as actions by "Wikipedia", for instance...306 KB (44,318 words) - 10:48, 26 May 2022
- help in the review: MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist/review. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC) Any one know the reason for the change in the spam...317 KB (43,931 words) - 09:48, 10 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 24 (section Eyes needed at Talk:Veterinary_chiropractic#Recent_Changes)multiple editors to cooperate in reverting bad edits than to seek administrative action. This places the rogue editor in the position of either giving way...252 KB (34,928 words) - 13:23, 28 January 2023
- Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination/2022 WMF letter (section New page review conversation: November 3 at 18:00 UTC)getting more specific, for example, "WMF wants to replace Backbone.js and Underscore.js with mw:Codex, and we think it'd take 100 hours, and the Moderator...92 KB (12,691 words) - 19:20, 17 April 2023
- mentioning in Government and administrative sections of the respective articles but it probably is too obscure to include even there. As for how the other...212 KB (24,631 words) - 22:57, 21 September 2021
- right. 2) Admins need to stop making administrative suicide by ArbCom actions. Yngvadottir's and GorillaWarfare's actions in these instances could have been...240 KB (34,576 words) - 00:27, 3 March 2023
- vote for or against anyone in the election, and no one can take administrative action against anyone for how they vote. This is not the first time you've...224 KB (31,726 words) - 20:32, 2 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive 65 (section Request for article class review)due). The template can be centrally edited to selectively include different administrative categories as may be helpful, such as, say, Category:NRHP unverified...250 KB (35,387 words) - 21:23, 26 March 2022
- explicit language answering Red Slash's proposal. Here it is: "... Since consensus and policy can change, these binding decisions may be reviewed at appropriate...122 KB (16,851 words) - 03:29, 19 October 2023
- Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Archive 19 (section is there a video showing the features of this software in action?)between two or more administrators in which they undo one another's administrative actions...." Please explain why your approval of Lightmouse does not violate...555 KB (70,907 words) - 01:06, 22 May 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 157 (section FAC needing an additional review/source review)Spanish-language pieces. Another thing you might do when red flags are triggered is review the talk page. I found these articles so odd that I reviewed talk...238 KB (33,243 words) - 09:28, 4 July 2024
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 18 (section User:Gryllida/DraftsReview/v2.js)purposes in addition to the ANI cabal will ask the question "What administrative action do you want from us?" with no real good answer short of blocking...362 KB (51,876 words) - 09:37, 3 April 2023
- does not preclude further action being taken against Stephen, but a Level 2 desysop is also only for removal of administrative permissions and does not...472 KB (66,569 words) - 05:48, 19 March 2023