Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Socionics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Case

Main case page (Talk)Evidence (Talk)Workshop (Talk)Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerks: MBisanz (Talk) & Lankiveil (Talk)Drafting arbitrator: Carcharoth (Talk)

Statement by Manning

I am the mediator on the above mentioned Mediation Cabal case. Informal mediation is ongoing and although it has been challenging, it has not yet reached a point in my opinion where it has failed. Hence I consider a request for arbitration to be premature at this moment. If informal mediation breaks down then formal mediation would be my recommended next step. Manning (talk) 02:53, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Things have deteriorated considerably since I posted my statement above, so I am withdrawing my comment. Manning (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is This Still Really Necessary?

Discussion has been moved here to keep everything together in one place. Lankiveil (speak to me) 21:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]