Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2013/Candidates/AGK

AGK

This is the talk page for discussing a candidate for election to the Arbitration Committee.

Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Use third-level headers for new sections.
- Example: === Heading title ===.
Unsure about the election process?
- Please review the election rules.
Issue with inappropriate commentary or questions?
- Please notify an election volunteer.

AGK

I always appreciate AGK's contributions and efforts during his time here as an arbcom member. As a participant in an Arbcom case on infoboxes, I was uninvolved and not sanctioned but did give out some proposals which AGK supported. He is a good editor and an arbcom member who I think would be willing to help make difficult decisions. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the Tea Party movement arbitration case was handled poorly. The proceedings lasted 6 months, then at the very end AGK added several previously uninvolved editors, presented no evidence against them, then recommended topic bans. TFD (talk) 08:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]