Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:Copying text from other sources" on Wikipedia
- COPY)the content originally came from. This may violate the attribution clause of the project's licenses. If you are copying text within Wikipedia, you must...40 KB (5,522 words) - 10:35, 17 June 2024identified that is material to the text it accompanies: it shows the use of sources, but also that not all sources are reliable. That's the page's entire...95 KB (10,216 words) - 01:28, 21 June 2024end of the article is to credit the source. There are other potential problems with copying long parts of text from public domain materials, but simply...254 KB (37,934 words) - 13:24, 4 February 2023something for which sources could be found). You would be within your right to remove unsourced text, but I myself would rather leave in such text, as long as...14 KB (1,555 words) - 08:58, 13 June 2024cite your sources, to prove you are enlarging on what others have created, you are developing what others have originated and not just copying what someone...92 KB (14,681 words) - 13:23, 4 February 2023discussion at Template talk:Copied#Should this template be removed?. In some not insignificant number of cases, copying content from a donor article to a recipient...14 KB (1,907 words) - 11:21, 30 April 2024interested in hearing opinions from others on this. — The Anome (talk) 07:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Symposium on Applications...24 KB (3,144 words) - 04:20, 21 June 20242007 (UTC) Copying an entire newspaper article to one's website would be a copyright violation, unless one has permission to do so. Copying a sentence...258 KB (39,625 words) - 14:56, 28 January 2023articles may not use other Wikipedia articles as sources…": surely this is much too strong. They are not considered citable sources, but they are perfectly...216 KB (33,447 words) - 09:34, 26 March 2022the text was copied from, as well. My suggestion is this: since it's clear (to me, anyway) that "use reliable sources" is a separate issue from "cite...38 KB (6,446 words) - 23:40, 19 April 2022section is that they can be used for other or additional text clarifications apart from the citation of the sources on which the article is based. In some...130 KB (20,212 words) - 13:25, 4 February 2023Wikipedia talk:Plagiarism/Archive 10 (category Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships)plagiarism" has problems, there is no example of how copying text from copyleft and PD sources is handled on Wikipedia. Either the title needs changing...113 KB (17,237 words) - 16:19, 9 March 2024preferred. When copying, moving or translating content from whatever wiki page governed by the Wikimedia Foundation to whatever other page with content...255 KB (39,995 words) - 14:15, 28 January 2023That webpage sources a google group message and provides a link to it, [2]. At the very bottom of that webpage appears the referenced text, On a Vancouver...291 KB (45,787 words) - 12:50, 10 March 2023
- present in plaintext sources.) That's a major advantage to online sources, since comparing printed texts is much more tedious. If other users adopt this technique
- underneath the quotation followed by citation text; although, citing numerous quotations from the same source could be cumbersome? Perhaps there's another
- would like to see the text thats been removed from WB:WIW/Unstable added/incorporated to this policy. Which was: Annotated texts are guides for helping
)