Search results
Did you mean: Wikipedia_talk:identifying_reliable_sources_ medicine include css include js include js speeches
The page "Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/include/css/include/js/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, or you may create the page "Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)/include/css/include/js/include/js/speech.js" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Electroconvulsive therapy is welcomed, as long as Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources_(medicine) is followed...upon looking at the respective histories...142 KB (18,233 words) - 18:46, 14 April 2023
- snap. I started by looking at WP:RELIABLE where I found Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources#Self-published sources (online and paper) (which I have...364 KB (47,444 words) - 12:47, 10 October 2023
- in medicine should be illustrated with reliable secondary sources describing the varying viewpoints. The use and presentation of primary sources should...506 KB (70,819 words) - 10:16, 3 April 2023
- "To request deletion of subpages where templates cannot be used (like .css and .js pages), add {{adminhelp}} to your talk page with the request instead...303 KB (40,498 words) - 09:16, 16 April 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 220 (section Names of organisms that include hyphens and dashes is not mentioned in the MOS)majority of reliable, English-language sources" is a view you have. You want to go counting English print sources to duplicate Low-MOS sources so as to make...421 KB (52,980 words) - 21:00, 27 March 2024
- Floydian τ ¢ 15:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC) I've confirmed that even without JS and CSS enabled, the mobile website now defaults to showing collapsed tables at...502 KB (62,534 words) - 19:19, 16 January 2023
- the Template:Link FA. However it needs the MediaWiki:Monobook.css and MediaWiki:Common.js to be updated to reflect this change. Is that a good idea to...125 KB (19,684 words) - 14:46, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2014 (category Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded)anything, but if you put a JS wizard king on it you probably can still optimize it considerably. The default mode is HTML-CSS, which is the best supported...859 bytes (89,604 words) - 20:12, 21 October 2020
- encourage others to find reliable sources so that the other side can be included. I really can't see anybody self-identifying as being on the Fringe, so...400 KB (55,439 words) - 08:14, 17 May 2022
- with Darkfrog24 -- reliable sources include both specialist and general sources. And looking at both specialist and general sources for birds, the majority...886 KB (123,139 words) - 18:19, 31 July 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2023 (category Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded)appropriately sourced (the footnotes support the article, the content of the sources is correctly represented in the article, the sources are reliable, etc.)...859 bytes (63,467 words) - 07:12, 31 January 2023
- religiosity, and minority perspectives on science and medicine" we are biased towards academic sources, haven't we always been? Wasn't that part of our DNA...143 KB (18,850 words) - 19:51, 8 November 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/Archive/2006 (category Pages where post-expand include size is exceeded)some of which have been pointed out. An additional source of concern is that the most reliable sources, say by math historians, will not attempt to assign...731 bytes (118,541 words) - 20:26, 21 October 2020
- Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 23 (section Are only "scholarly" sources acceptable in Canadian history articles?)"scholarly" sources are acceptable. Is that correct? What counts as a reliable source Further information: Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources Editors...251 KB (32,999 words) - 14:58, 28 January 2023
- help, could someone turn them off without editing magic pages (monobook.css/js)? Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC) Oh. My. Gosh. No, no, no...433 KB (68,849 words) - 09:03, 9 May 2022
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Archive 6 (section Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/compact opera.css)utilitarian objects. Reliable sources will refer to many things as art and to an extent we are compelled to follow those sources. And there is no great...219 KB (26,791 words) - 17:21, 18 May 2024
- virtually never used in the reliable sources. You can call it whatever you want, but let's at least acknowledge what the actual sources call the two different...243 KB (36,374 words) - 09:14, 10 October 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 119 (section Amending WP:DASH to include a note about figure dashes)supermajority of sources, both on and off of the Internet. Usually, "use the sources" means "one reliable source will do," and when using sources for facts that...522 KB (75,358 words) - 16:12, 14 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (footnotes)/Archive 11 (section Merging refs when different quotes used from same source)php or Common.css); the brackets are ugly, unnecessary, and (as far as I know) not in line with usage in high-quality reliable sources. Ucucha 04:59,...209 KB (29,475 words) - 10:19, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/archive64 (section Requesting a sources spotcheck for a FAC)like this? I can't do it in pure CSS, so it needs JavaScript to work - although much of Wikipedia also now needs JS for its functionality, so I guess...222 KB (33,029 words) - 14:25, 4 February 2023