Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/L235

This is an RfA talk page.

While voting and most discussion should occur on the main RfA page, sometimes discussions stray off-topic or otherwise clutter that page. The RfA talk page serves to unclutter the main RfA page by hosting discussions that are not related to the candidacy.

Please remain calm and civil in discussions on both pages, avoiding personal attacks and harassment. Uninvolved administrators can still fully intervene in RfAs.
Discussions should stay on-topic; consider moving or continuing discussions that are going off-topic elsewhere.
Move discussions not germane to the candidacy here, then link them with {{subst:rfan|dm|name of section header}}, indented to the original vote. Be conservative in using the template; obvious trolls and disruptive participants need not be noticed.
Otherwise, avoid starting discussions here if they would be of interest to RfA participants and can fit on the main RfA page; generally, discussions should begin at the "General comments" section or as an indented reply to a vote.

Closing

Quick! Close this while it's at net +235 support! Perfect coincidence! Natureium (talk) 14:13, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arf - but 5 of us have messed that up Icarusgeek (talk)

Nah, just you. 239 support - 4 oppose = 235. Natureium (talk) 14:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could oppose if that helps? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. I would appreciate that, but he probably wouldn't. Natureium (talk) 15:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some people - never happy ;-) Icarusgeek (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, this was an empty talk page until this thread was started. Wonder if that's happened before... Sign of a drama-free RfA perhaps. — Amakuru (talk) 15:25, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! In every single RfA, every single oppose is brought to the talk page and there's some huge giant discussion over it. This time would've been the first RfA I've ever seen that had an empty talk page!--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 15:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]