Search results
The page "Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/js/language-change.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, or you may create the page "Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/js/language-change.js" directly, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll/Archive 1. If a user is unhappy with their poll result and would...87 KB (12,526 words) - 17:59, 4 February 2023
- talk:Requests for adminship/Tamzin/Bureaucrat chat · Just wanted to note… · Request from Moneytrees[edit] · Rebuttal to ... Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tamzin...228 KB (34,400 words) - 13:09, 2 June 2024
- adminship candidacies, which is linked from the top of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. -- tariqabjotu 16:59, 23 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the...130 KB (19,229 words) - 02:41, 16 May 2022
- Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll worked as intended in this case - namely, by encouraging a good candidate to go for it. --MelanieN...72 KB (2,555 words) - 17:44, 4 February 2023
- would be beneficial at reducing stress for the RfA candidate. Opponents to the change often pointed out that many RfAs are already closed within a few hours...182 KB (25,800 words) - 02:35, 3 May 2023
- the closing crat to decide what is ignored. I know in my RfA Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Polargeo 2 it was just a neutral but it may have been a genuine...203 KB (26,245 words) - 10:18, 3 April 2023
- please change the layout of RFA pages to support per-section editing? With lots of questions, edit counts and edit summary histories, and some RFAs attracting...96 KB (14,888 words) - 17:42, 4 February 2023
- guess whoever has the poll on their watchlist have RfA at their watchlist as well.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC) For some reason, someone...35 KB (1,636 words) - 17:29, 4 February 2023
- until the RfA finishes as well. That being said, I think we probably reword the link to said RfA. "Trappist the monk's current request for adminship" may be...65 KB (8,023 words) - 13:15, 15 March 2023
- the old RFA standards pages (since made historical), a link to a thread on young admin candidates, editcountitis on RFAs, "clutter" on RFAs, the 1000th...131 KB (19,230 words) - 21:13, 19 May 2022
- be enough. WP:RfA transcludes a few pages, like {{Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Front matter}} and {{Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/bureaucratship}}...273 KB (41,201 words) - 18:34, 23 April 2023
- We really out rename Requests for Adminship to Requests to be Nitpicked. When exactly did the RfA environment become so toxic that the smallest details...184 KB (26,065 words) - 17:39, 4 February 2023
- grounds for opposition. A candidate who declines to answer a majority of the "optional questions" is going to have a very difficult time passing an RfA successfully...227 KB (32,278 words) - 09:59, 21 March 2023
- unsuccessful RfA candidates from this year, and what happened next. User:Worm That Turned/Unsuccessful RFAs shows that many candidates do carry on. However...215 KB (29,972 words) - 21:57, 25 May 2022
- wasn't deleted upon request, then it's very difficult to obtain context on prior requests. With RFA, when Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/William Rotelle...166 KB (25,852 words) - 14:18, 28 January 2023
- endorsement should suffice. I suggest a "dummy" RFA page is created at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NewUsername (viz., where people will find it) with...169 KB (25,043 words) - 19:37, 18 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Editor review/Archive 2 (section What do we do about the demand for RfA-readiness and RfA-improvement evaluations?)should Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship be revised? Or part of it spun off, into a (shudder) "Self-evaluation of your RfA prospects"? Or, at mimimum...111 KB (15,865 words) - 15:01, 8 May 2022
- another trophy like trial adminship for users to get before they can pass RFA [...] It would de facto be required before RFA As mentioned above, this is...183 KB (27,238 words) - 08:35, 21 March 2023
- barrier of entry than one user requesting adminship? Voting is not a replacement for discussion. The results of the poll were taken into heart, and a discussion...170 KB (23,993 words) - 20:10, 28 February 2023
- standards at RfA. Response: This role is an additional utility for people who make reports at AIV, nothing more. This role is so far away from adminship that...206 KB (28,714 words) - 15:44, 25 February 2024