Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia talk:Scientific peer review/include/assets/assets/logo.png" does not exist. You can click on "Wikipedia talk:Scientific peer review/include/assets/assets/logo.png" to create the page directly, or you may request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- GiantSnowman 09:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC) Since File:FC Esperia Viareggio logo.png was nominated for deletion for the following concern...240 KB (32,348 words) - 01:48, 16 October 2018
- we cite only Peer Review journals, and to stop them from attempting to delete paranormal ideas and concepts because they are not scientific. After all,...249 KB (37,382 words) - 07:40, 4 February 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Archive 31 (section Two at peer review, both topics have editors who want GA status)2013 (UTC) I am attempting to make the information scientifically accurate. I source only peer reviewed journals, outline that the human treatments as "pre-clinical"...272 KB (38,429 words) - 08:55, 21 April 2023
- have many articles at the moment.The peer review thing was a link that predates the creation of our peer review (About 20 days ago) I fixed it--Phoenix-wiki (talk ·...251 KB (33,049 words) - 18:53, 11 December 2022
- infobox seems to have no bearing. This was a *.gif logo I just downloaded and converted to *.png. Not a big deal, but if I'm making some obvious boneheaded...76 KB (10,693 words) - 13:33, 21 July 2023
- Start-B-A scale and GA status. The assessment scale also does not include WP:PEER review, either. As for your olympic tables, I don't see what problem is...174 KB (25,358 words) - 20:58, 2 March 2023
- to ask for someone to upload a better resolution of a {{PD-logo}} image, File:Ss logo.png, but it was really hard to navigate the wizard because it kept...263 KB (37,099 words) - 18:36, 18 October 2023
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Archive 146 (section Peer review request for Montana-class battleship)should be made to this discussion. Montana-class battleship I'm opening a peer review request, as it has been nine years since the last one, and in the past...249 KB (34,959 words) - 09:27, 4 July 2024
- December 2021 (UTC) I would highly appreciate all comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Kingdom of Hungary (1000–1301)/archive3. Borsoka (talk) 03:00, 1 January...100 KB (12,870 words) - 15:36, 23 March 2024
- in/img/datagov-logo.e4dfb331.svg [10]https://pmfme.mofpi.gov.in/pmfme/assets/img/mofpi/mainlogohd.png why are you uploading old 2005 logo which is too thin...240 KB (31,019 words) - 16:52, 4 February 2023
- a logo for the Arbitration Committee File:ArbCom logo beta.png that never got used...except in one 2012 Signpost article. Is it OK if I G7 the logo or...143 KB (18,840 words) - 19:51, 8 November 2023
- currently a featured article nominee. The article was currently under peer review but considering the comments of many that it should be featured, I decided...241 KB (32,508 words) - 13:23, 28 July 2023
- the tabs the same. I'd debate whether we need some of those tabs - the peer-review page is pretty much dead, but I accept the argument that more prominence...249 KB (32,718 words) - 18:01, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 10 (section Labrador retriever at Peer review)01:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Labrador retriever is up at peer review, please see Wikipedia:Peer review/Labrador Retriever/archive1. Cirt (talk) 06:12, 10 June...507 KB (74,977 words) - 10:36, 4 July 2023
- editors to review). These are the summarized suggestions. Ensure a neutral POV in articles edited by consciously trying to find and include material that...562 KB (79,374 words) - 05:25, 18 February 2022
- article status? I saw Spiritual use of cannabis recently received a peer review (thanks to Whig)... any other suggestions? --Another Believer (Talk)...254 KB (31,560 words) - 11:01, 4 February 2023