Wikipedia talk:What "Ignore all rules" means
project's impact scale. | ||
 | The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links. | |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2021
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tax Assessor-Collector: Marcus A. Peña (R) – first elected in 2012
Tax Assessor-Collector: Kim Rinn (R) – first elected in 2016 Kgrinn (talk) 16:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:What "Ignore all rules" means. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:44, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Problem with the wording :(
Hello dear,
I might of found a problem in the "Use common sense" section; readers might not know the proverbial meaning of "loss of perspective". 160.32.212.38 (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Seems like some problem with the first bullet point in WP:NOTIAR
For example, you cannot violate Wikipedia:No legal threats without being blocked
— does it mean you can violate it after being blocked? Or, I am misunderstanding it? Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 07:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think it’s trying to say that; just that one would get blocked if they violated that rule. One may be able to violate many rules on Wikipedia before or after being blocked, even if the circumstances do not warrant doing so, but that would almost certainly lead to further consequences. –Gluonz talk contribs 15:30, 23 January 2024 (UTC)