Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia talk:What is consensus?" on Wikipedia
- (the article) at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion#What_is_the_default_for_.22No_Consensus.22_between_.22Delete.22_.28the_article.29_and_.22Redirect...12 KB (1,516 words) - 20:27, 28 February 2023
- for input on an issue." What makes you think that "a way to ask the Wikipedia community for input" would result in "a consensus among a limited group of...19 KB (2,645 words) - 02:23, 1 May 2024
- should seek to say what consensus IS, not what it is NOT. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:01, 26 October 2008 (UTC) Unfortunately, consensus is an art and not a science...17 KB (2,362 words) - 23:33, 23 March 2013
- feel is inferior in most cases to Consensus required.[/soap] But what I'm getting at is that it isn't applied to pages often, and even when it is, generally...59 KB (7,956 words) - 23:06, 21 June 2021
- consensus. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:09, 10 October 2008 (UTC) This seems like yet another tool for extreme minorities to bludgeon mainstream consensus with...2 KB (236 words) - 17:52, 6 February 2013
- Wikipedia:Don't revert due solely to "no consensus"#How to respond to a "no consensus" edit summary, what to do if the person is seen not be active in three days...9 KB (1,134 words) - 11:00, 30 April 2024
- something has consensus unless someone objects to it. J Milburn (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Maybe I'm just an idiot, but what exactly is the procedure...89 KB (12,771 words) - 12:31, 28 January 2023
- something has consensus unless someone objects to it. J Milburn (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC) Maybe I'm just an idiot, but what exactly is the procedure...89 KB (12,771 words) - 12:31, 28 January 2023
- established consensus (unless there are new arguments etc.). We ought to be encouraging a culture in which current consensus (once we know for sure what it is) is...202 KB (30,497 words) - 13:33, 4 February 2023
- definitions, this is specifically addressed by Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus vs. supermajority. Ultimately, I guess what I'm saying is that this is a policy,...163 KB (24,291 words) - 12:01, 4 February 2023
- WP:Policies and guidelines which is the consensus view of what policies are; but where's the definition of what consensus means? It's here.- Wolfkeeper 00:41...423 KB (64,484 words) - 14:22, 30 May 2022
- closed per rough consensus, not consensus. Wikipedia:Deletion_guidelines_for_administrators#Rough_consensus is good for what it is, but it is limited to admins...6 KB (840 words) - 19:06, 4 February 2023
- standing consensus is that there is a consensus as to what constitutes a consensus, but no consensus as to what that consensus actually is. Of course...212 KB (38,077 words) - 20:31, 2 March 2023
- is now necessary for us to write down our definition of just what a Wikipedia article is (some people may be confused with the "edit any article" statement...11 KB (1,641 words) - 05:05, 23 April 2024
- this is starting. I'm quite fond of a good consensus! Erich 05:42, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC) I like how this page thinks about the problems of consensus in big...155 KB (23,771 words) - 06:54, 30 January 2023
- by definition that is what consensus would find. Johnuniq (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC) @Johnuniq: Egads! The background is most certainly not the...199 KB (27,723 words) - 00:11, 23 April 2022
- think it would be an easy solution to document here what WP:POINT means by a false consensus. Is this an improvement? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:44, 26 September...209 KB (31,825 words) - 13:34, 4 February 2023
- is a non-productive academic argument. Only this corollary tells the reader what they should do. If someone has asserted a "silent consensus", it is not...31 KB (4,718 words) - 18:49, 8 February 2022
- the section Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages, it says both that The goal in a consensus-building discussion is to reach a compromise...233 KB (34,399 words) - 14:22, 30 May 2022
- improved, clearly there is no consensus for my proposed changes. As always, I am happy to follow the consensus; my attitude is that if my proposal was...197 KB (29,879 words) - 21:55, 18 September 2022
- a lot of people from WP just take quotes from pages there, where the consensus was to get rid of or trim down the amount of quotes, and so they just
- what Wikisource includes, or should or shouldn't include. It seems to me that for the most part it won't be hard to agree on a pretty wide consensus,
- comments agreeing with it. This is truly the fundamental conflict, I believe. I saw no consensus there. Wikibooks_talk:What_is_Wikibooks#Videgame_guides_revisited